Possibility of wrong F@H calculations from undervolting
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 9:29 pm
Hi all,
I have a 5700 XT underclocked to 1821 MHz at 920 mV, and it gets about 850.000 to 900.000 PPD. I tested this voltage on OCCT, and it shows no errors at all, but if I lower it to 910 mV, the benchmark will start to get errors. I'm a little worried that the errors shown in the OCCT benchmark are equivalent to wrong results at F@H calculations.
Do I need to be worried at all about sending wrong results due to insufficient voltage, or any other reason?
The F@H application has never given me such a warning, except when the Radeon driver crashes as well and it's obvious that voltage is too low.
I have a 5700 XT underclocked to 1821 MHz at 920 mV, and it gets about 850.000 to 900.000 PPD. I tested this voltage on OCCT, and it shows no errors at all, but if I lower it to 910 mV, the benchmark will start to get errors. I'm a little worried that the errors shown in the OCCT benchmark are equivalent to wrong results at F@H calculations.
Do I need to be worried at all about sending wrong results due to insufficient voltage, or any other reason?
The F@H application has never given me such a warning, except when the Radeon driver crashes as well and it's obvious that voltage is too low.