What are the "canon" servers?
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:44 am
Checking through some FAH server stats, as my CPU slot is not able to connect to folding dot stanford dot edu now (and neither are online ping tools), I found that there appears to be some "inconsistency" on what servers are used by FAH, which seem to be hard-coded in places such as the forum header and the part of the client responsible for asking for WUs.
Some examples I noticed recently:
One older laptop I have folding part-time used to connect to folding.stanford..., and switched without notice to fahwebx.stanford...;
Intermittently, the GPU assignment server has been down for short periods of time;
The old FAH website was hosted at folding.stanford..., along with the old NaCl client and the current "simplified" FAH Online Control. For some months, the new FAH website has been foldingathome.stanford..., but the old one is still active and ranked first in Google Search (the new one doesn't even appear in the first page, here; shouldn't the new one replace the old one, so as to compensate spending/effort in the redesign, as well as provide better UX for new/prospective users?);
Some files, such as GPUs.txt, hard-linked in a much-referenced thread this forum, were at fah-web.stanford..., which seems to have been offline for a while now, precluding downloads needed for GPU configuration;
The server status page on the header has listed a lot of servers as DOWN for long, continuous periods - so, are those out of circulation permanently (and thus, should they be removed?), or have their maintainers not had time/reason to manually reset/configure them?
These "inconsistencies" sometimes prevent clients from downloading certain cores/WUs, accessing some features, and make it harder to figure out what address a wget command should be issued for downloading FAHClient through command-line (e.g., on Linux machines managed through SSH).
So, with all that being said, is there any plan to reduce those inconsistencies, or at least provide/maintain a list of what servers are actually "canon" and active for each purpose?
Some examples I noticed recently:
One older laptop I have folding part-time used to connect to folding.stanford..., and switched without notice to fahwebx.stanford...;
Intermittently, the GPU assignment server has been down for short periods of time;
The old FAH website was hosted at folding.stanford..., along with the old NaCl client and the current "simplified" FAH Online Control. For some months, the new FAH website has been foldingathome.stanford..., but the old one is still active and ranked first in Google Search (the new one doesn't even appear in the first page, here; shouldn't the new one replace the old one, so as to compensate spending/effort in the redesign, as well as provide better UX for new/prospective users?);
Some files, such as GPUs.txt, hard-linked in a much-referenced thread this forum, were at fah-web.stanford..., which seems to have been offline for a while now, precluding downloads needed for GPU configuration;
The server status page on the header has listed a lot of servers as DOWN for long, continuous periods - so, are those out of circulation permanently (and thus, should they be removed?), or have their maintainers not had time/reason to manually reset/configure them?
These "inconsistencies" sometimes prevent clients from downloading certain cores/WUs, accessing some features, and make it harder to figure out what address a wget command should be issued for downloading FAHClient through command-line (e.g., on Linux machines managed through SSH).
So, with all that being said, is there any plan to reduce those inconsistencies, or at least provide/maintain a list of what servers are actually "canon" and active for each purpose?