New to FAH; confirm typical performance
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2015 3:54 am
I started running FAH a couple of days ago & have completed 19 WUs for about 31000 points.
For the workunits that are currently running, the CPU estimate is about 32000 points per day, and the GPU estimate is 8873 ppd.
I have the web control power setting at Full. I manually pause the client when I'm actually using my PC, so it probably folds about 17 to 20 hours a day.
The CPU is a Xeon E5-1650, the graphics card is a Quadro K4000. When folding, CPU utilization is about 92% across all cores. GPU-z reports a GPU load of about 99%.
Is this folding performance typical for my setup? Why is the GPU estimate so low, and so much lower than the CPU point estimate?
I appreciate having the opportunity to contribute to FAH, and I'm not overly concerned about the points, but I am curious about other folders who get over 100K points per day with other graphics cards.
Thanks for your help with this.
For the workunits that are currently running, the CPU estimate is about 32000 points per day, and the GPU estimate is 8873 ppd.
I have the web control power setting at Full. I manually pause the client when I'm actually using my PC, so it probably folds about 17 to 20 hours a day.
The CPU is a Xeon E5-1650, the graphics card is a Quadro K4000. When folding, CPU utilization is about 92% across all cores. GPU-z reports a GPU load of about 99%.
Is this folding performance typical for my setup? Why is the GPU estimate so low, and so much lower than the CPU point estimate?
I appreciate having the opportunity to contribute to FAH, and I'm not overly concerned about the points, but I am curious about other folders who get over 100K points per day with other graphics cards.
Thanks for your help with this.