Page 1 of 1
Project 8052 TPF differences with 4 and 8 cores?
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 2:45 pm
by pmsfh2008
Probably answered elsewhere but -
I am running P8052's and notice -
(593,1,22) @ 00:00:37 on 8 cores
(339,2,8) @ 00:02:42 on 4 cores
Seems like a big difference to me.
Any Thoughts?
Thanks
PS - see profile for environment details
Re: Project 8052 TPF differences with 4 and 8 cores?
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:11 pm
by Joe_H
After decyphering your profile, I assume you are talking of running this in a VM on your i7. Apparently version 7 of the folding client. If you are getting the TPF numbers from FAHControl, there is a known issue that it does not report TPF or PPD accurately for some projects. The values reported will oscillate around the actual number. To get an accurate value look at the times reported in the log, averaged over a number of frames that will be a better number.
Edit: Project 8052 appears to still be in beta, any project specific support for this will be found in the Beta forum.
Re: Project 8052 TPF differences with 4 and 8 cores?
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:27 pm
by 7im
Unrelated to the specific WU, what are the "other" 4 "cores" doing when not folding? Idle?
Re: Project 8052 TPF differences with 4 and 8 cores?
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 2:37 am
by pmsfh2008
opps, I updated to v7 (windows for all) last week or so
So, 4 core is doing 2x GPU @ 80%
Thanks
PS: Beta ?? I am not a beta AFAIK; getting TPF from HFM v0.9.1; For FAH Control !!Really do not see this is out of Beta!@#$%^
MB: GB GA-EP45-UD3P /GB GA-P55-UD3R
CPU: Intel Q9550 C2Q (@3.4 GHz) /Intel i7-860 (@3.762 Ghz)
RAM: 8GB Mushkin 996622 Ascent 996580 /Mushkin 8GB 2x 996782 frosty
GPU: 2x EVGA GTX260-216 SC (@1350) /Gigabyte GeForce 210
OS: Vista 64b / Vista 32b
Folding: SMP + 2x GPU /SMPx8
[updated 8/26/12 - i7 Vista v7.1.52 updated]
Re: Project 8052 TPF differences with 4 and 8 cores?
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 3:44 am
by iceman1992
Joe_H wrote:Edit: Project 8052 appears to still be in beta, any project specific support for this will be found in the Beta forum.
Really? I've been getting 8052 since yesterday and my client's not doing beta..
Re: Project 8052 TPF differences with 4 and 8 cores?
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 3:58 am
by Jesse_V
iceman1992 wrote:Joe_H wrote:Edit: Project 8052 appears to still be in beta, any project specific support for this will be found in the Beta forum.
Really? I've been getting 8052 since yesterday and my client's not doing beta..
8052 appears in psummary:
http://fah-web.stanford.edu/psummary.html which according to the Beta Team Rules of Engagement thread, lists "Public Projects (normal, advmethods/advanced and bigadv)"
Re: Project 8052 TPF differences with 4 and 8 cores?
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 6:30 am
by Joe_H
My mistake, I missed the one-line post in the beta area announcing it went to advanced. Usually they are posted in the Updates thread.
Jesse_V wrote:8052 appears in psummary, which according to the Beta Team Rules of Engagement thread, lists "Public Projects (normal, advmethods/advanced and bigadv)"
Some months ago there was a post noting that projects were appearing on the psummary list that should only show on the psummaryB list. There was a followup that they were looking into fixing that, I don't know if they did. It seemed to be connected to having a mix of beta and non-beta projects on the same server. So being on psummary may not be definitive.
Re: Project 8052 TPF differences with 4 and 8 cores?
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 6:47 am
by iceman1992
Joe_H wrote:My mistake, I missed the one-line post in the beta area announcing it went to advanced.
But mine is normal FAH, not advanced.
Re: Project 8052 TPF differences with 4 and 8 cores?
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 7:41 am
by Joe_H
iceman1992 wrote:But mine is normal FAH, not advanced.
That I don't know about, perhaps the project owner forgot to post the change.
Re: Project 8052 TPF differences with 4 and 8 cores?
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:59 am
by Aardvark
Is there a single "official" listing that accurately states the status of each Project? I believe that I occasionally receive Beta WUs (not advanced) and I am not designated a Beta Team member. How do you check?? Rule of Thumb is "If they deal them, you Fold them".
Re: Project 8052 TPF differences with 4 and 8 cores?
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 10:23 am
by bollix47
@Aardvark
If the project is listed on the Project Summary (link at top of page) then it is no longer considered beta. However, it could still be in the advanced category.
Re: Project 8052 TPF differences with 4 and 8 cores?
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 12:55 pm
by artoar_11
@ pmsfh2008,
Q9650 @ 3,40 GHz; Win7/32b; p8052; TPF ~56 s; PPD ~ 8170
Code: Select all
[17:18:09] + Processing work unit
[17:18:09] A4 will attempt to use 4 threads.
[17:18:09] Core required: FahCore_a4.exe
[17:18:09] Core found.
[17:18:09] Working on queue slot 09 [August 29 17:18:09 UTC]
[17:18:09] + Working ...
[17:18:09] - Calling '.\FahCore_a4.exe -dir work/ -nice 19 -suffix 09 -np 4 -nocpulock -checkpoint 9 -verbose -lifeline 3376 -version 634'
[17:18:09]
[17:18:09] *------------------------------*
[17:18:09] Folding@Home Gromacs GB Core
[17:18:09] Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010)
[17:18:09]
[17:18:09] Preparing to commence simulation
[17:18:09] - Looking at optimizations...
[17:18:09] - Created dyn
[17:18:09] - Files status OK
[17:18:09] - Expanded 683760 -> 1756256 (decompressed 256.8 percent)
[17:18:09] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=683760 data_size=1756256, decompressed_data_size=1756256 diff=0
[17:18:09] - Digital signature verified
[17:18:09]
[17:18:09] Project: 8052 (Run 328, Clone 11, Gen 0)
[17:18:09]
[17:18:09] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[17:18:09] Entering M.D.
[17:18:15] Mapping NT from 4 to 4
[17:18:15] Completed 0 out of 250000 steps (0%)
[17:19:12] Completed 2500 out of 250000 steps (1%)
[17:20:10] Completed 5000 out of 250000 steps (2%)
[17:21:07] Completed 7500 out of 250000 steps (3%)
[17:22:04] Completed 10000 out of 250000 steps (4%)
[17:23:01] Completed 12500 out of 250000 steps (5%)
[17:23:58] Completed 15000 out of 250000 steps (6%)
[17:24:11] - Autosending finished units... [August 29 17:24:11 UTC]
[17:24:11] Trying to send all finished work units
[17:24:11] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[17:24:11] - Autosend completed
[17:24:56] Completed 17500 out of 250000 steps (7%)
[17:25:54] Completed 20000 out of 250000 steps (8%)
[17:26:51] Completed 22500 out of 250000 steps (9%)
[17:27:48] Completed 25000 out of 250000 steps (10%)
[17:28:45] Completed 27500 out of 250000 steps (11%)
[17:29:42] Completed 30000 out of 250000 steps (12%)
[17:30:39] Completed 32500 out of 250000 steps (13%)
[17:31:36] Completed 35000 out of 250000 steps (14%)
[17:32:33] Completed 37500 out of 250000 steps (15%)
[17:33:30] Completed 40000 out of 250000 steps (16%)
[17:34:27] Completed 42500 out of 250000 steps (17%)
[17:35:25] Completed 45000 out of 250000 steps (18%)
[17:36:23] Completed 47500 out of 250000 steps (19%)
[17:37:20] Completed 50000 out of 250000 steps (20%)
[17:38:17] Completed 52500 out of 250000 steps (21%)
[17:39:14] Completed 55000 out of 250000 steps (22%)
[17:40:11] Completed 57500 out of 250000 steps (23%)
[17:41:08] Completed 60000 out of 250000 steps (24%)
[17:42:06] Completed 62500 out of 250000 steps (25%)
[17:43:02] Completed 65000 out of 250000 steps (26%)
[17:43:59] Completed 67500 out of 250000 steps (27%)
[17:44:56] Completed 70000 out of 250000 steps (28%)
[17:45:55] Completed 72500 out of 250000 steps (29%)
[17:46:53] Completed 75000 out of 250000 steps (30%)
[17:47:50] Completed 77500 out of 250000 steps (31%)
[17:48:49] Completed 80000 out of 250000 steps (32%)
[17:49:47] Completed 82500 out of 250000 steps (33%)
[17:50:46] Completed 85000 out of 250000 steps (34%)
[17:51:43] Completed 87500 out of 250000 steps (35%)
[17:52:41] Completed 90000 out of 250000 steps (36%)
[17:53:39] Completed 92500 out of 250000 steps (37%)
[17:54:37] Completed 95000 out of 250000 steps (38%)
[17:55:34] Completed 97500 out of 250000 steps (39%)
[17:56:31] Completed 100000 out of 250000 steps (40%)
[17:57:29] Completed 102500 out of 250000 steps (41%)
[17:58:26] Completed 105000 out of 250000 steps (42%)
[17:59:24] Completed 107500 out of 250000 steps (43%)
[18:00:22] Completed 110000 out of 250000 steps (44%)
[18:01:20] Completed 112500 out of 250000 steps (45%)
[18:02:18] Completed 115000 out of 250000 steps (46%)
[18:03:16] Completed 117500 out of 250000 steps (47%)
[18:04:14] Completed 120000 out of 250000 steps (48%)
[18:05:12] Completed 122500 out of 250000 steps (49%)
[18:06:11] Completed 125000 out of 250000 steps (50%)
[18:07:09] Completed 127500 out of 250000 steps (51%)
[18:08:08] Completed 130000 out of 250000 steps (52%)
[18:09:06] Completed 132500 out of 250000 steps (53%)
[18:10:04] Completed 135000 out of 250000 steps (54%)
[18:11:03] Completed 137500 out of 250000 steps (55%)
[18:12:02] Completed 140000 out of 250000 steps (56%)
[18:13:00] Completed 142500 out of 250000 steps (57%)
[18:13:59] Completed 145000 out of 250000 steps (58%)
[18:14:58] Completed 147500 out of 250000 steps (59%)
[18:15:56] Completed 150000 out of 250000 steps (60%)
[18:16:54] Completed 152500 out of 250000 steps (61%)
[18:17:52] Completed 155000 out of 250000 steps (62%)
[18:18:49] Completed 157500 out of 250000 steps (63%)
[18:19:48] Completed 160000 out of 250000 steps (64%)
[18:20:46] Completed 162500 out of 250000 steps (65%)
[18:21:44] Completed 165000 out of 250000 steps (66%)
[18:22:43] Completed 167500 out of 250000 steps (67%)
[18:23:42] Completed 170000 out of 250000 steps (68%)
[18:24:41] Completed 172500 out of 250000 steps (69%)
[18:25:40] Completed 175000 out of 250000 steps (70%)
[18:26:38] Completed 177500 out of 250000 steps (71%)
[18:27:37] Completed 180000 out of 250000 steps (72%)
[18:28:35] Completed 182500 out of 250000 steps (73%)
[18:29:33] Completed 185000 out of 250000 steps (74%)
[18:30:32] Completed 187500 out of 250000 steps (75%)
[18:31:30] Completed 190000 out of 250000 steps (76%)
[18:32:28] Completed 192500 out of 250000 steps (77%)
[18:33:26] Completed 195000 out of 250000 steps (78%)
[18:34:25] Completed 197500 out of 250000 steps (79%)
[18:35:23] Completed 200000 out of 250000 steps (80%)
[18:36:21] Completed 202500 out of 250000 steps (81%)
[18:37:19] Completed 205000 out of 250000 steps (82%)
[18:38:16] Completed 207500 out of 250000 steps (83%)
[18:39:14] Completed 210000 out of 250000 steps (84%)
[18:40:12] Completed 212500 out of 250000 steps (85%)
[18:41:10] Completed 215000 out of 250000 steps (86%)
[18:42:08] Completed 217500 out of 250000 steps (87%)
[18:43:06] Completed 220000 out of 250000 steps (88%)
[18:44:03] Completed 222500 out of 250000 steps (89%)
[18:45:07] Completed 225000 out of 250000 steps (90%)
[18:46:05] Completed 227500 out of 250000 steps (91%)
[18:47:03] Completed 230000 out of 250000 steps (92%)
[18:48:01] Completed 232500 out of 250000 steps (93%)
[18:48:59] Completed 235000 out of 250000 steps (94%)
[18:49:58] Completed 237500 out of 250000 steps (95%)
[18:50:55] Completed 240000 out of 250000 steps (96%)
[18:51:52] Completed 242500 out of 250000 steps (97%)
[18:52:50] Completed 245000 out of 250000 steps (98%)
[18:53:48] Completed 247500 out of 250000 steps (99%)
[18:54:46] Completed 250000 out of 250000 steps (100%)
[18:54:46] DynamicWrapper: Finished Work Unit: sleep=10000
[18:54:56]
[18:54:56] Finished Work Unit:
[18:54:56] - Reading up to 586464 from "work/wudata_09.trr": Read 586464
[18:54:56] trr file hash check passed.
[18:54:56] - Reading up to 350880 from "work/wudata_09.xtc": Read 350880
[18:54:56] xtc file hash check passed.
[18:54:56] edr file hash check passed.
[18:54:56] logfile size: 23452
[18:54:56] Leaving Run
[18:54:59] - Writing 966384 bytes of core data to disk...
[18:54:59] Done: 965872 -> 915864 (compressed to 94.8 percent)
[18:54:59] ... Done.
[18:55:00] - Shutting down core
[18:55:00]
[18:55:00] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[18:55:03] CoreStatus = 64 (100)
[18:55:03] Unit 9 finished with 98 percent of time to deadline remaining.
[18:55:03] Updated performance fraction: 0.976537
[18:55:03] Sending work to server
[18:55:03] Project: 8052 (Run 328, Clone 11, Gen 0)
[18:55:03] + Attempting to send results [August 29 18:55:03 UTC]
[18:55:03] - Reading file work/wuresults_09.dat from core
[18:55:03] (Read 916376 bytes from disk)
[18:55:03] Connecting to http://171.67.108.58:8080/
[18:55:07] Posted data.
[18:55:07] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~223 kB/s
[18:55:07] - Averaged speed for that direction ~200 kB/s
[18:55:07] + Results successfully sent
[18:55:07] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
[18:55:07] + Number of Units Completed: 852
Re: Project 8052 TPF differences with 4 and 8 cores?
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:03 pm
by pmsfh2008
humm,
A look at the task manager shows HFM eating up +/- 25% CPU
On P7200 (17/6/282)
With HFM HFM FAH Control
TPF 14.53 13.06
Without HFM 5.22 - may further decrease based upon how calculated.
--
So HFM is out for me.
FYI
