Page 1 of 1

6516 (17 40 10) will not fold.

Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 11:50 am
by The_Celt
Hi. I have a work unit that wil not progress past 'Entering M.D.'
Here is the log. I'll be dumping this unit to get another. This machine is not overclocked, and has been folding for years successfully.

Code: Select all

# Windows CPU Console Edition #################################################
###############################################################################

                       Folding@Home Client Version 6.23

                          http://folding.stanford.edu

###############################################################################
###############################################################################

Launch directory: D:\FoldingAtHome\CPU_2
Service: D:\FoldingAtHome\CPU_2\Folding@home-Win32-x86.exe
Arguments: -svcstart -d D:\FoldingAtHome\CPU_2 -verbosity 9 

Launched as a service.
Entered D:\FoldingAtHome\CPU_2 to do work.

[11:44:57] - Ask before connecting: No
[11:44:57] - User name: The_Celt (Team 80258)
[11:44:57] - User ID: (*$@)(^@$)(%^)%@^
[11:44:57] - Machine ID: 7
[11:44:57] 
[11:44:57] Loaded queue successfully.
[11:44:57] 
[11:44:57] + Processing work unit
[11:44:57] Core required: FahCore_78.exe
[11:44:57] Core found.
[11:44:57] - Autosending finished units... [May 31 11:44:57 UTC]
[11:44:57] Trying to send all finished work units
[11:44:57] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[11:44:57] - Autosend completed
[11:44:57] Working on queue slot 08 [May 31 11:44:57 UTC]
[11:44:57] + Working ...
[11:44:57] - Calling '.\FahCore_78.exe -dir work/ -suffix 08 -checkpoint 15 -service -verbose -lifeline 1080 -version 623'

[11:44:58] 
[11:44:58] *------------------------------*
[11:44:58] Folding@Home Gromacs Core
[11:44:58] Version 1.90 (March 8, 2006)
[11:44:58] 
[11:44:58] Preparing to commence simulation
[11:44:58] - Ensuring status. Please wait.
[11:45:15] - Looking at optimizations...
[11:45:15] - Working with standard loops on this execution.
[11:45:15] - Created dyn
[11:45:15] - Files status OK
[11:45:16] - Expanded 650811 -> 3293185 (decompressed 506.0 percent)
[11:45:16] - Starting from initial work packet
[11:45:16] 
[11:45:16] Project: 6516 (Run 17, Clone 40, Gen 10)
[11:45:16] 
[11:45:16] Entering M.D.
[11:45:23] Gromacs error.
[11:45:23] 
[11:45:23] Folding@home Core Shutdown: UNKNOWN_ERROR
[11:45:26] CoreStatus = 79 (121)
[11:45:26] Client-core communications error: ERROR 0x79
[11:45:26] This is a sign of more serious problems, shutting down.
Mod Edit: Added Code Tags - PantherX

Re: 6516 (17 40 10) will not fold.

Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 7:07 pm
by John_Weatherman
Is it trying to do the WU over and over again? I see you have a "Working with standard loops on this execution." message in the log, have you had problems with the machine?

Re: 6516 (17 40 10) will not fold.

Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 9:46 pm
by PantherX
Nothing in the WU Database yet:
No data back from query
It has been marked for a follow-up.

Re: 6516 (17 40 10) will not fold.

Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 12:05 pm
by The_Celt
MBM, No, it just sat there, there were no new entries in the log for several hours. It produced the same log results every time I restarted the service. So I deleted queue.dat and \work several times until I got a new work unit. This is a dual PIII motherboard running at 1 GHz, no other problems. I have two folders running here, no great daily points, but it folds day in and day out for several years now. It is now working on 6509(R6, C33, G91) and is due to complete 06/04/11 20:54.

Re: 6516 (17 40 10) will not fold.

Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 1:17 pm
by bruce
It may not show us anything, but if you still have the WU, I suggest you stop the service and try running the client interactively. It's pretty rare, but sometimes there are unexplained things that happen with a service that are more easily explained using the standard client.

Personally, I'm guessing it's a bad WU, so if the WU is gone or it's too much trouble, don't worry about it.

Re: 6516 (17 40 10) will not fold.

Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 12:05 pm
by The_Celt
Bruce, No, I did delete the work unit. Thanks for the suggestion, I'll try that manual run in a cmd prompt next time.