Page 1 of 1
Possibly unusual activity on account
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 8:28 pm
by DragonLord
I think I'm seeing some unusual activity on my account. It seems as if my score is increasing during a time where I have not turned in any units, and the
stats page indicates that there were two clients in the last seven days, instead of the expected one. Can anyone tell me what's happening and post a log of recent WUs returned, if possible? Is there an actual problem or is it just me?
I am currently folding one SMP slot with three threads and one GPU slot on Folding@home client 7.1.24.
Re: Unusual activity on account
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 8:32 pm
by 7im
I don't understand... SMP = 1 client, GPU = 1 client, 1+1 = 2 clients. Were both clients running all week or not?
Re: Possibly unusual activity on account
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 8:34 pm
by DragonLord
Previously, however, the system appeared to handle both slots as being from one client. Both slots were running continuously.
Re: Possibly unusual activity on account
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 8:38 pm
by 7im
That may be true. V7 handles client counts differently than v6. Not sure that is sorted out yet. Anyway...
What are the PRCG numbers from the last work unit completed by the GPU? by SMP? It will help them track this down.
Re: Possibly unusual activity on account
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 8:42 pm
by DragonLord
P6068-R0-C149-G267 (SMP) and P5737-R0-C591-G386 (GPU).
Re: Possibly unusual activity on account
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 9:06 pm
by bruce
Hi Dragon250 (team 0),
Your WU (P5737 R0 C591 G386) was added to the stats database on 2011-05-23 06:05:10 for 511 points of credit.
Hi Dragon250 (team 0),
Your WU (P6068 R0 C149 G267) was added to the stats database on 2011-05-23 13:07:12 for 481 points of credit.
You did get credit for both of them, which isn't the question you asked, but is part of the research process.
According to the stats, you have 3 clients(slots) that have returned WUs recently. All are on Windows with an Athlon processor.
One has not returned a result since 2011-05-04 09:05:56 and that was P6883 R716 C5 G82 so we can probably forget about that one as it's no longer active.
The other two clients(slots) are on the same Machine. I don't see a problem.
Have you actively added/removed/re-added slots?
Re: Possibly unusual activity on account
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 9:09 pm
by DragonLord
Yes, slots were recently changed. The last time this was done, a uniprocessor slot was removed and the SMP slot was set from 2 to 3 threads. P6883 is a uniprocessor project.
Re: Possibly unusual activity on account
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 9:19 pm
by bruce
Make no changes to the clients or slots that you're running.
Wait at least 7 days.. Visit your
official stats and see if you believe the value shown for
Active clients (within 7 days).
Re: Possibly unusual activity on account
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 9:24 pm
by DragonLord
Thank you. I'll post back by then. I thought someone else was using my username...
Re: Possibly unusual activity on account
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 11:30 pm
by 7im
That's what a passkey is for. You can search the stats by username and passkey to filter your points.
Re: Possibly unusual activity on account
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 11:32 pm
by PantherX
DragonLord wrote:Thank you. I'll post back by then. I thought someone else was using my username...
I do hope that the stats will return back to normal. However if someone else is folding under your username, then there's nothing that can be done... Sorry. However, as long as you use the passkey, it shouldn't be any issues with your points.
Re: Possibly unusual activity on account
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 12:15 am
by DragonLord
I've noticed that there is a mismatch between the scores with and without the passkey. However, since I started Folding@home without a passkey and the points difference is small, there does not appear to be any other person using this username. I'll continue to monitor the stats page for any problems.
Edit: I just searched the
user summary and did not find more than one instance of the username Dragon250, which would have occured had there been multiple passkeys in use (see this
Folding@home blog post).