Page 1 of 1

Project: 2686 (Run 1, Clone 9, Gen 64)

Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2011 1:14 am
by [Inpact]Terminou
hello

i got the following :e( :e( :e( :e( :e( :e(
[22:13:29] - Ask before connecting: No
[22:13:29] - User name: [Inpact]Terminou (Team 51)
[22:13:29] - User ID: 77930681455CFAA6
[22:13:29] - Machine ID: 2
[22:13:29]
[22:13:29] Loaded queue successfully.
[22:13:29]
[22:13:29] + Processing work unit
[22:13:29] Core required: FahCore_a3.exe
[22:13:29] - Autosending finished units... [January 15 22:13:29 UTC]
[22:13:29] Trying to send all finished work units
[22:13:29] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[22:13:29] - Autosend completed
[22:13:29] Core found.
[22:13:29] Working on queue slot 07 [January 15 22:13:29 UTC]
[22:13:29] + Working ...
[22:13:29] - Calling '.\FahCore_a3.exe -dir work/ -nice 19 -suffix 07 -np 24 -checkpoint 3 -service -verbose -lifeline 2564 -version 630'

[22:13:31]
[22:13:31] *------------------------------*
[22:13:31] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
[22:13:31] Version 2.22 (Mar 12, 2010)
[22:13:31]
[22:13:31] Preparing to commence simulation
[22:13:31] - Looking at optimizations...
[22:13:31] - Files status OK
[22:13:37] - Expanded 25461874 -> 31941441 (decompressed 125.4 percent)
[22:13:37] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=25461874 data_size=31941441, decompressed_data_size=31941441 diff=0
[22:13:37] - Digital signature verified
[22:13:37]
[22:13:37] Project: 2686 (Run 1, Clone 9, Gen 64)
[22:13:37]
[22:13:37] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[22:13:37] Entering M.D.
[22:13:43] Using Gromacs checkpoints
[22:13:54] Resuming from checkpoint
[22:13:55] Verified work/wudata_07.log
[22:13:55] Verified work/wudata_07.trr
[22:13:55] Verified work/wudata_07.xtc
[22:13:55] Verified work/wudata_07.edr
[22:13:56] Completed 193744 out of 250000 steps (77%)
[22:22:21] Completed 195000 out of 250000 steps (78%)
[22:38:04] Completed 197500 out of 250000 steps (79%)
[22:53:18] Completed 200000 out of 250000 steps (80%)
[23:08:27] Completed 202500 out of 250000 steps (81%)
[23:20:53] CoreStatus = FF (255)
[23:20:53] Sending work to server
[23:20:53] Project: 2686 (Run 1, Clone 9, Gen 64)
[23:20:53] - Error: Could not get length of results file work/wuresults_07.dat
[23:20:53] - Error: Could not read unit 07 file. Removing from queue.
[23:20:53] Trying to send all finished work units
[23:20:53] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[23:20:53] - Preparing to get new work unit...
[23:20:53] Cleaning up work directory
[23:20:53] + Attempting to get work packet
[23:20:53] Passkey found
Did my pc something wrong ?

Re: Project: 2686 (Run 1, Clone 9, Gen 64)

Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2011 3:10 am
by Grandpa_01
What are you running it on. I do not think it is the Q6600 you have listed in your sig. Is it OCed, usually when you get an error it is an OC problem but it could be a bad WU.

Re: Project: 2686 (Run 1, Clone 9, Gen 64)

Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2011 10:45 am
by [Inpact]Terminou
oups sorry!!! it is my old Rig.. The new one is quite different. :twisted:

EVGA SR2, Bi Xeon 5680, 6 * 2 GO Corsair XMS3 Cas 9 2000MHz
MM Extended Ascension, Be Quiet 1200W P8
2 GAINWARD GTX 260-896 GS 896 Mo (WC)
Velociraptor 600Go Sata III
2 WB CPU EK Supreme HF NICKEL-ACETAL, EK-FB SR2 - NICKEL-ACETAL
3 EK-Waterblocks radiateur CoolStream RAD-XT 360+1 phobya 360 G-Changer + 26 be quiet 120mm silentwings pure (PUSH/PULL)
2 DDC-1 Plus 12 Volts 18W, 2 Kaze Serveur 5,25" noir SCYTHE, 2 Réservoirs Baie EK-BAY SPIN Acetal
Feser One Cooling Fluid (RED)

Re: Project: 2686 (Run 1, Clone 9, Gen 64)

Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2011 7:42 pm
by Grandpa_01
Just an educated guess but I would say your OC is not 100% stable (Nice rig by the way) I do not think you have any heating problems from looking at your specks so you might want to bump the Voltage up a little or drop the BCLK down by 1. I do not know what you have your memory running at but mine requires 1.5v on QPI and 1.65v DRAM in order to run 100% stable at 2000Mhz. But in the testing I have done there is no reason to run at 2000Mhz, If I run my memory at 1728Mhz 7-7-7-24-72-1N settings I will gain about 40sec per frame on a 6900 verses running it at 2020Mhz 8-8-8-24-88-2N. I do not have an SR2 but from what I have read they do tend to have problems with higher memory speeds.

Re: Project: 2686 (Run 1, Clone 9, Gen 64)

Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:37 pm
by [Inpact]Terminou
Hi,

i'm currently running @stock. and memories are @ 1333MHz. I planed to O/C later.

Re: Project: 2686 (Run 1, Clone 9, Gen 64)

Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2011 10:35 pm
by Grandpa_01
I did a search I could not find where anyone else had reported having trouble with the WU, perhaps one of the mods can look it up and see if anyone else has completed it yet. I most likely will be a few day until it gets reassigned and run though but it is possible somebody had it before you did. If it does get completed by someone else I would test the memory.

Re: Project: 2686 (Run 1, Clone 9, Gen 64)

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 12:18 am
by sortofageek
I just checked for Project: 2686 (Run 1, Clone 9, Gen 64). There is nothing in the database at this point.

Re: Project: 2686 (Run 1, Clone 9, Gen 64)

Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 7:23 pm
by sortofageek
Project: 2686 (Run 1, Clone 9, Gen 64) was added to the stats database on 2011-01-21 01:09:10 for 75463.8 points of credit for a different folder.

Re: Project: 2686 (Run 1, Clone 9, Gen 64)

Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 8:12 pm
by Grandpa_01
Thanks for the update sortofageek at least now if [Inpact]Terminou looks at this thread again he will know the issue was caused by his hardware and be able to start doing some trouble shooting. My guess would be memory maybe need a little voltage increase ot timings / speed lowered.