Page 1 of 2

Project: 2692 (Run 1, Clone 23, Gen 28)

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:54 am
by Mstenholm
I got this:
[06:13:45] Completed 245000 out of 250000 steps (98%)
[06:27:38] CoreStatus = C000001D (-1073741795)
[06:27:38] Client-core communications error: ERROR 0xc000001d

Do I have a HW problem?

W3670 @ 4 GHZ, done about 10 -bigadv before this.

Re: Project: 2692 (Run 1, Clone 23, Gen 28)

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:16 pm
by sortofageek
Please post the log.

Re: Project: 2692 (Run 1, Clone 23, Gen 28)

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:33 pm
by Mstenholm
Here you are - I did cut some out since I couldn't figure out to make it neat

19:29:23] *------------------------------*
[19:29:23] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
[19:29:23] Version 2.22 (Mar 12, 2010)
[19:29:23]
[19:29:23] Preparing to commence simulation
[19:29:23] - Looking at optimizations...
[19:29:23] - Created dyn
[19:29:23] - Files status OK
[19:29:31] - Expanded 24873199 -> 30796325 (decompressed 123.8 percent)
[19:29:31] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=24873199 data_size=30796325, decompressed_data_size=30796325 diff=0
[19:29:31] - Digital signature verified
[19:29:31]
[19:29:31] Project: 2692 (Run 1, Clone 23, Gen 28)
[19:29:31]
[19:29:32] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[19:29:32] Entering M.D.
[19:29:40] Completed 0 out of 250000 steps (0%)
[19:50:54] Completed 2500 out of 250000 steps (1%)
[20:12:09] Completed 5000 out of 250000 steps (2%)
.
.
[04:28:14] Completed 232500 out of 250000 steps (93%)
[04:49:32] Completed 235000 out of 250000 steps (94%)
[05:10:36] Completed 237500 out of 250000 steps (95%)
[05:31:40] Completed 240000 out of 250000 steps (96%)
[05:52:42] Completed 242500 out of 250000 steps (97%)
[06:13:45] Completed 245000 out of 250000 steps (98%)
[06:27:38] CoreStatus = C000001D (-1073741795)
[06:27:38] Client-core communications error: ERROR 0xc000001d
[06:27:38] Deleting current work unit & continuing...
[06:27:54] - Preparing to get new work unit...
[06:27:54] Cleaning up work directory
[06:27:54] + Attempting to get work packet
[06:27:54] Passkey found

Re: Project: 2692 (Run 1, Clone 23, Gen 28)

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:37 pm
by sortofageek
You use the code tags to post more of a log. Paste the log, highlight it, click on the Code button at the top of the message frame.

There is no data back on this one, but I'll mark it for follow-up. If someone does complete it, we'll let you know. If it does this to everyone who gets it, we'll have to make a judgment call at some point to call it bad.

What happened next? Did you get the same WU or a different one?

Re: Project: 2692 (Run 1, Clone 23, Gen 28)

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:42 pm
by sortofageek
When I search the internet on 0xc000001d keyword, I get several hits which seem to point to registry corruption and recommend various registry cleanup tools. I'm not familiar with any of those tools, so I'm not including a link to any of them.

Re: Project: 2692 (Run 1, Clone 23, Gen 28)

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:54 pm
by Mstenholm
I got a 6701 and rised the OC by 75 MHz just to stress the system. So far (85%) so good. 100%, yes I will check memory if the problem persist. Currently running 7-8-7-24 on a 6-7-6-24 set.

Re: Project: 2692 (Run 1, Clone 23, Gen 28)

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:53 pm
by sortofageek
If you continue to have the problems, check memory, consider reducing the overclock.

Re: Project: 2692 (Run 1, Clone 23, Gen 28)

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:24 pm
by Mstenholm
Update: Got the same WU again. Killed it and changed machine ID.

Re: Project: 2692 (Run 1, Clone 23, Gen 28)

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:16 pm
by Mstenholm
What are the odds - I had the same one on my other rig and it just completed so I must have bad HW. Sorry to have taken up your time.

Re: Project: 2692 (Run 1, Clone 23, Gen 28)

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:21 pm
by sortofageek
Bad HW or too much of an overclock ...

Re: Project: 2692 (Run 1, Clone 23, Gen 28)

Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 2:05 am
by Grandpa_01
Most likley too much OC may need a little more V

Re: Project: 2692 (Run 1, Clone 23, Gen 28)

Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 2:40 am
by sortofageek
Mstenholm wrote:What are the odds - I had the same one on my other rig and it just completed so I must have bad HW. .

Hi MStenholm (team 50711),
Your WU (P2692 R1 C23 G28) was added to the stats database on 2010-11-01 15:12:55 for 77281.6 points of credit.

Re: Project: 2692 (Run 1, Clone 23, Gen 28)

Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 6:25 pm
by DrSpalding
sortofageek wrote:When I search the internet on 0xc000001d keyword, I get several hits which seem to point to registry corruption and recommend various registry cleanup tools. I'm not familiar with any of those tools, so I'm not including a link to any of them.
Those "hits" are simply adverts.

The meaning of 0xC000001D is:

Code: Select all

#define STATUS_ILLEGAL_INSTRUCTION       ((NTSTATUS)0xC000001DL)
This could be a memory problem with the overclock, or it could be a corrupted image on disk. It may also be an overwrite of memory, although not likely unless the program is trying to run dynamic code. The most likely is a corrupted function pointer and it tried to run in the middle of an instruction.

Re: Project: 2692 (Run 1, Clone 23, Gen 28)

Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 11:11 pm
by Fahrenheit451
77281.6 points for one WU????

Re: Project: 2692 (Run 1, Clone 23, Gen 28)

Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 12:42 am
by PantherX
Fahrenheit451 wrote:77281.6 points for one WU????
Yep, it is only for bigadv WUs. You can get much higher if your system is 24+ Cores 8-)