Page 1 of 1

Project: 6041 (Run 0, Clone 129, Gen 62)

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 1:27 pm
by johnerz
Hi I've had a failure on this WU today. I'm overclocked to 4.2 but don't normaly have issues, recently I've pulled some memory as i was getting errors on memtest and failing P95 blend, I now pass all those with no issues.
Is this a bad WU, or do @I need to start checking my overclock for stability :)

Thanks


[12:24:30] Completed 180000 out of 250000 steps (72%)
[12:37:36] Completed 182500 out of 250000 steps (73%)
[12:51:08] Completed 185000 out of 250000 steps (74%)
[13:05:10] Completed 187500 out of 250000 steps (75%)
[13:06:30] mdrun returned 255
[13:06:30] Going to send back what have done -- stepsTotalG=250000
[13:06:30] Work fraction=0.7509 steps=250000.
[13:06:34] logfile size=140132 infoLength=140132 edr=0 trr=25
[13:06:34] logfile size: 140132 info=140132 bed=0 hdr=25
[13:06:34] - Writing 140670 bytes of core data to disk...
[13:06:34] ... Done.
[13:06:35]
[13:06:35] Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END
[13:06:39] CoreStatus = 72 (114)
[13:06:39] Sending work to server
[13:06:39] Project: 6041 (Run 0, Clone 129, Gen 62)

Re: Project: 6041 (Run 0, Clone 129, Gen 62)

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 3:31 pm
by sortofageek
You did receive partial credit for this, but you are the only one who has returned results for this WU so far. It is too early to tell if it is a bad WU, but we'll keep an eye on it for you. :)
Hi johnerz (team 111065),
Your WU (P6041 R0 C129 G62) was added to the stats database on 2010-09-23 06:10:21 for 1047.53 points of credit.

Re: Project: 6041 (Run 0, Clone 129, Gen 62)

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 5:03 pm
by johnerz
Thank, I appreciate that :)

Re: Project: 6041 (Run 0, Clone 129, Gen 62)

Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 2:32 pm
by sortofageek
Following up with you, this work unit has now been completed successfully, so I can't call it a bad WU. Sorry.

While you may want to check overclocks, hardware, etc., in my experience, EUEs do not generally indicate a problem with your equipment. I wouldn't be concerned unless that machine consistently produced EUEs.

Re: Project: 6041 (Run 0, Clone 129, Gen 62)

Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 12:08 pm
by bruce
FAH is generally considered to be a lot more sensitive to memory errors than most applications. If you're showing any errors with memtest, you're going to get occasional EUEs. I recommend you replace questionable memory and if you've modified the memory clocks and voltages, you might consider not pushing your memory quite so hard.