Hi I've had a failure on this WU today. I'm overclocked to 4.2 but don't normaly have issues, recently I've pulled some memory as i was getting errors on memtest and failing P95 blend, I now pass all those with no issues.
Is this a bad WU, or do @I need to start checking my overclock for stability
Thanks
[12:24:30] Completed 180000 out of 250000 steps (72%)
[12:37:36] Completed 182500 out of 250000 steps (73%)
[12:51:08] Completed 185000 out of 250000 steps (74%)
[13:05:10] Completed 187500 out of 250000 steps (75%)
[13:06:30] mdrun returned 255
[13:06:30] Going to send back what have done -- stepsTotalG=250000
[13:06:30] Work fraction=0.7509 steps=250000.
[13:06:34] logfile size=140132 infoLength=140132 edr=0 trr=25
[13:06:34] logfile size: 140132 info=140132 bed=0 hdr=25
[13:06:34] - Writing 140670 bytes of core data to disk...
[13:06:34] ... Done.
[13:06:35]
[13:06:35] Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END
[13:06:39] CoreStatus = 72 (114)
[13:06:39] Sending work to server
[13:06:39] Project: 6041 (Run 0, Clone 129, Gen 62)
Project: 6041 (Run 0, Clone 129, Gen 62)
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 3:21 pm
- Hardware configuration: Intel 2600K @ stock
EVGA GTX 970 FTW+ @ stock
8gb Samsung green @ 1.55v 2040 9,10,10,1T
Asus P67 Sabertooth bios version 3209
Corsair hx 1000 psu
WD Black 500 GB
Win 7 64, updated,Microsoft Security Essentials - updated daily
SupermicroH8QGi+-F, 4 X AMD 6168 @ 1.9 no OC
Corsair HX 850 PSU 16 x 2GB HyperX 1600 ram
Ubuntu 12.04, using the musky/tear mods
Updated 03 Feb 2015
Project: 6041 (Run 0, Clone 129, Gen 62)
johnerz
Intel 2600K @ stock
EVGA 670 FTW @ stock
12GB 1600
Asus P67 Sabertooth bios version 3209
Corsair hx 1000 psu
WD Black 500 GB
Win 7 64, updated
Microsoft Security Essentials - updated daily
Updated 4 Dec 2012
Intel 2600K @ stock
EVGA 670 FTW @ stock
12GB 1600
Asus P67 Sabertooth bios version 3209
Corsair hx 1000 psu
WD Black 500 GB
Win 7 64, updated
Microsoft Security Essentials - updated daily
Updated 4 Dec 2012
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3110
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:06 pm
- Location: Team Helix
- Contact:
Re: Project: 6041 (Run 0, Clone 129, Gen 62)
You did receive partial credit for this, but you are the only one who has returned results for this WU so far. It is too early to tell if it is a bad WU, but we'll keep an eye on it for you.
Hi johnerz (team 111065),
Your WU (P6041 R0 C129 G62) was added to the stats database on 2010-09-23 06:10:21 for 1047.53 points of credit.
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 3:21 pm
- Hardware configuration: Intel 2600K @ stock
EVGA GTX 970 FTW+ @ stock
8gb Samsung green @ 1.55v 2040 9,10,10,1T
Asus P67 Sabertooth bios version 3209
Corsair hx 1000 psu
WD Black 500 GB
Win 7 64, updated,Microsoft Security Essentials - updated daily
SupermicroH8QGi+-F, 4 X AMD 6168 @ 1.9 no OC
Corsair HX 850 PSU 16 x 2GB HyperX 1600 ram
Ubuntu 12.04, using the musky/tear mods
Updated 03 Feb 2015
Re: Project: 6041 (Run 0, Clone 129, Gen 62)
Thank, I appreciate that
johnerz
Intel 2600K @ stock
EVGA 670 FTW @ stock
12GB 1600
Asus P67 Sabertooth bios version 3209
Corsair hx 1000 psu
WD Black 500 GB
Win 7 64, updated
Microsoft Security Essentials - updated daily
Updated 4 Dec 2012
Intel 2600K @ stock
EVGA 670 FTW @ stock
12GB 1600
Asus P67 Sabertooth bios version 3209
Corsair hx 1000 psu
WD Black 500 GB
Win 7 64, updated
Microsoft Security Essentials - updated daily
Updated 4 Dec 2012
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3110
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:06 pm
- Location: Team Helix
- Contact:
Re: Project: 6041 (Run 0, Clone 129, Gen 62)
Following up with you, this work unit has now been completed successfully, so I can't call it a bad WU. Sorry.
While you may want to check overclocks, hardware, etc., in my experience, EUEs do not generally indicate a problem with your equipment. I wouldn't be concerned unless that machine consistently produced EUEs.
While you may want to check overclocks, hardware, etc., in my experience, EUEs do not generally indicate a problem with your equipment. I wouldn't be concerned unless that machine consistently produced EUEs.
Re: Project: 6041 (Run 0, Clone 129, Gen 62)
FAH is generally considered to be a lot more sensitive to memory errors than most applications. If you're showing any errors with memtest, you're going to get occasional EUEs. I recommend you replace questionable memory and if you've modified the memory clocks and voltages, you might consider not pushing your memory quite so hard.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.