Folding Forum

Posted: **Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:51 am**

Hello

It is not the first time i have this issue on 6702 project

[14:44:46] 
[14:44:46] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[14:44:46] Entering M.D.
[14:44:53] Completed 0 out of 2000000 steps  (0%)
[14:55:57] Completed 20000 out of 2000000 steps  (1%)
[15:07:03] Completed 40000 out of 2000000 steps  (2%)
[15:18:06] Completed 60000 out of 2000000 steps  (3%)
[15:29:09] Completed 80000 out of 2000000 steps  (4%)
....

[02:23:58] Completed 1260000 out of 2000000 steps  (63%)
[02:34:59] Completed 1280000 out of 2000000 steps  (64%)
[02:46:01] Completed 1300000 out of 2000000 steps  (65%)
[02:57:06] Completed 1320000 out of 2000000 steps  (66%)
[03:08:10] Completed 1340000 out of 2000000 steps  (67%)
[03:11:11] Gromacs cannot continue further.
[03:11:11] Going to send back what have done -- stepsTotalG=2000000
[03:11:11] Work fraction=0.6727 steps=2000000.
[03:11:15] logfile size=199300 infoLength=199300 edr=0 trr=23
[03:11:15] logfile size: 199300 info=199300 bed=0 hdr=23
[03:11:15] - Writing 199836 bytes of core data to disk...
[03:11:15]   ... Done.
[03:11:15] 
[03:11:15] Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END
[03:11:19] CoreStatus = 72 (114)
[03:11:19] Sending work to server
[03:11:19] Project: 6702 (Run 10, Clone 22, Gen 13)


[03:11:19] + Attempting to send results [July 28 03:11:19 UTC]
[03:11:19] - Reading file work/wuresults_07.dat from core
[03:11:19]   (Read 199836 bytes from disk)
[03:11:19] Connecting to http://171.64.65.56:8080/
[03:11:22] Posted data.
[03:11:22] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~65 kB/s
[03:11:22] - Averaged speed for that direction ~93 kB/s
[03:11:22] + Results successfully sent
[03:11:22] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.

That's very hard to get only 620 points after folding more than 12H

Posted: **Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:09 am**

[Inpact]Terminou wrote:...It is not the first time i have this issue on 6702 project...

If this is something that you see on a regular basis, then I would start looking into hardware related items. If it is reported as bad, you may be unlucky to get so may bad WUs. If it is reported as good, then you should check your hardware.

Posted: **Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:46 am**

Yes but if i'm credited like i mentioned. That's not an hardware issue isn't it ?

Posted: **Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:59 am**

You may be given partial credits for EUEs however, if there are reports that the WU was able to finish successfully, then I would suggest that you check your hardware. Do remember that a small percentage of WUs from a Project may EUE, that is natural. For example, I have finished 199 SMP2 WUs without a single EUE. My GPU has finished ~900 WUs where it had only 3 EUEs that were caused by my fault; first was Windows Update and the second was my OC on my GPU which I had to reduce so that the new drivers would function properly. YMMV but there are very few WUs which are bad.

Posted: **Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:22 pm**

The error relates to instabilities with RAM timings either being to tight or not enough voltage to QPI and or IOH settings.

Posted: **Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:35 am**

You're the second person to try this WU; the first donor didn't get any points. But his machine trashes 670x-class WU's regularly, so I wouldn't take his failure too seriously.

Folding Forum

Project: 6702 (Run 10, Clone 22, Gen 13)

Project: 6702 (Run 10, Clone 22, Gen 13)

Re: 6702 (Run 10, Clone 22, Gen 13)

Re: 6702 (Run 10, Clone 22, Gen 13)

Re: Project: 6702 (Run 10, Clone 22, Gen 13)

Re: Project: 6702 (Run 10, Clone 22, Gen 13)

Re: Project: 6702 (Run 10, Clone 22, Gen 13)