Folding Forum

Posted: **Mon Mar 22, 2010 3:40 am**

According to HFM, the WU has only 100 frames. Why is it that the number of frames observed is usually higher or lower than the amount of frames for a WU? Take the following for example.

Code: Select all

 Project ID: 6020
 Core: GRO-A3
 Credit: 467
 Frames: 100


 Name: CPU
 Path: C:\Folding@Home\CPU\
 Number of Frames Observed: 46

 Min. Time / Frame : 00:09:47 - 2,888.8 PPD
 Avg. Time / Frame : 00:11:23 - 2,301.7 PPD


 Name: Legit Reviews
 Path: \\VALERIE-PC\Folding\
 Number of Frames Observed: 190

 Min. Time / Frame : 00:18:17 - 1,130.8 PPD
 Avg. Time / Frame : 00:21:25 - 891.9 PPD

Posted: **Mon Mar 22, 2010 4:06 am**

HFM will benchmark whatever it can sample, up to the 300 most recent frames for a client/project combination. If you started HFM when a log file was showing a work unit resuming at 54% and eventually finishing, HFM will see just 46 frames worth of times.

Posted: **Mon Mar 22, 2010 11:09 am**

Please use the tool official thread for this kind of questions : viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9903

Folding Forum

WU Frame Amount Different From Amount of Frames Observed

WU Frame Amount Different From Amount of Frames Observed

Re: WU Frame Amount Different From Amount of Frames Observed

Re: WU Frame Amount Different From Amount of Frames Observed