Page 1 of 1

4 GPU's Missing

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 3:20 am
by weedacres
Over the last week I've lost about 20K points a day. I determined that the points were missing from my 10 gpu folding clients, but since they were all grouped into 1 username weedacres_gpu I couldn't tell which ones were missing.
Yesterday I separated them out into 10 separate names and now can see that gpu0, gpu2, gpu3 & gpu5 all in team 52523 are missing (while I was at it I setup passkeys for each gpu0-gpu8).

Here's the log from gpu0:

Code: Select all

--- Opening Log file [March 9 03:04:31 UTC]


# Windows GPU Console Edition #################################################
###############################################################################

                       Folding@Home Client Version 6.20

                          http://folding.stanford.edu

###############################################################################
###############################################################################

Launch directory: C:\GPU0
Executable: gpu
Arguments: -gpu 0 -verbosity 9

[03:04:31] - Ask before connecting: No
[03:04:31] - User name: gpu0 (Team 52523)
[03:04:31] - User ID: 3E34899A69C37D0A
[03:04:31] - Machine ID: 1
[03:04:31]
[03:04:31] Loaded queue successfully.
[03:04:31]
[03:04:31] - Autosending finished units... [March 9 03:04:31 UTC]
[03:04:31] + Processing work unit
[03:04:31] Trying to send all finished work units
[03:04:31] Core required: FahCore_11.exe
[03:04:31] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[03:04:31] Core found.
[03:04:31] - Autosend completed
[03:04:31] Working on queue slot 05 [March 9 03:04:31 UTC]
[03:04:31] + Working ...
[03:04:31] - Calling '.\FahCore_11.exe -dir work/ -suffix 05 -priority 96 -check
point 15 -verbose -lifeline 35932 -version 620'

[03:04:32]
[03:04:32] *------------------------------*
[03:04:32] Folding@Home GPU Core
[03:04:32] Version 1.31 (Tue Sep 15 10:57:42 PDT 2009)
[03:04:32]
[03:04:32] Compiler  : Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 14
.00.50727.762 for 80x86
[03:04:32] Build host: amoeba
[03:04:32] Board Type: Nvidia
[03:04:32] Core      :
[03:04:32] Preparing to commence simulation
[03:04:32] - Looking at optimizations...
[03:04:32] - Files status OK
[03:04:32] - Expanded 73952 -> 383588 (decompressed 518.6 percent)
[03:04:32] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=73952 data_size=3835
88, decompressed_data_size=383588 diff=0
[03:04:32] - Digital signature verified
[03:04:32]
[03:04:32] Project: 6600 (Run 2, Clone 79, Gen 1)
[03:04:32]
[03:04:32] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[03:04:32] Entering M.D.
[03:04:38] Will resume from checkpoint file
[03:04:38] Tpr hash work/wudata_05.tpr:  224520900 1729769281 1739234948 3153675
411 242417652
[03:04:38]
[03:04:38] Calling fah_main args: 14 usage=90
[03:04:38]
[03:04:38] Working on Protein
[03:04:39] Client config found, loading data.
[03:04:39] Starting GUI Server
[03:04:39] Resuming from checkpoint
[03:04:39] fcCheckPointResume: retreived and current tpr file hash:
[03:04:39]    0    224520900    224520900
[03:04:39]    1   1729769281   1729769281
[03:04:39]    2   1739234948   1739234948
[03:04:39]    3   3153675411   3153675411
[03:04:39]    4    242417652    242417652
[03:04:39] fcCheckPointResume: file hashes same.
[03:04:40] fcCheckPointResume: state restored.
[03:04:40] Verified work/wudata_05.log
[03:04:40] Verified work/wudata_05.edr
[03:04:40] Verified work/wudata_05.xtc
[03:04:40] Completed 29%
[03:06:12] Completed 30%
[03:07:43] Completed 31%
[03:09:14] Completed 32%
I did a search on gpu0 but find nothing associated with team 52523. It's completed 15 wu's and successfully sent them in since I made the name change.

I've been running these for years with no problem like this before.

Could one of the mods take a look at this and see if anything show up?

Thanks

Re: 4 GPU's Missing

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 3:32 am
by Hyperlife
If those GPUs are running 660x WUs, it could be related to the stats problems discussed here.

Re: 4 GPU's Missing

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:01 am
by weedacres
Hyperlife wrote:If those GPUs are running 660x WUs, it could be related to the stats problems discussed here.
Many thanks Hyperlife, That's exactly what they are doing.
I'll move over there.