Project 10005
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 9:29 pm
				
				I'm just wondering if anyone else has noticed the major drop in PPD folding the above project 10005?
My PPD from FahMon show:
Compared with:
Is this due to the new method of benchmarking? I thought it might have been due to a bonus system being employed for this work unit, but from the psummary this doesn't appear to be the case.
Anyway, I don't mind to much, I'm just interested into whether this was to be expected or not. I may have to turn off advanced methods on my older machines if they can't meet the deadline (although as it's only worth 126 points they should be able to complete within the 4 days 8 hours).
Edit: The computer in question is the dell Optiplex listed first in my additional rigs section of my signature.
			My PPD from FahMon show:
Code: Select all
Project : 6316
 Core    : Gromacs
 Frames  : 100
 Credit  : 336
 -- command --
 Min. Time / Frame : 11mn 30s  - 420.73 ppd
 Avg. Time / Frame : 11mn 44s  - 412.36 ppd
 Cur. Time / Frame : 11mn 49s  - 409.46 ppd
 R3F. Time / Frame : 11mn 50s  - 408.88 ppd
 Eff. Time / Frame : 13mn 23s  - 361.52 ppdCode: Select all
 Project : 10005
 Core    : Unknown
 Frames  : 100
 Credit  : 126
 -- command --
 Min. Time / Frame : 4mn 50s  - 375.39 ppd
 Avg. Time / Frame : 9mn 56s  - 182.66 ppd
 Cur. Time / Frame : 19mn 52s  - 91.33 ppd
 R3F. Time / Frame : 21mn 34s  - 84.13 ppd
 Eff. Time / Frame : 10mn 06s  - 179.64 ppdIs this due to the new method of benchmarking? I thought it might have been due to a bonus system being employed for this work unit, but from the psummary this doesn't appear to be the case.
Anyway, I don't mind to much, I'm just interested into whether this was to be expected or not. I may have to turn off advanced methods on my older machines if they can't meet the deadline (although as it's only worth 126 points they should be able to complete within the 4 days 8 hours).
Edit: The computer in question is the dell Optiplex listed first in my additional rigs section of my signature.