Folding Forum

Posted: **Sat Dec 12, 2009 6:20 pm**

I've had these Amber units (46xx WUs) immediately EUE on 5 different clients over the past few weeks.

Project: 4600 (Run 35, Clone 49, Gen 44)
Project: 4625 (Run 37, Clone 64, Gen 60)
Project: 4626 (Run 21, Clone 74, Gen 41)
Project: 4611 (Run 20, Clone 63, Gen 35)
Project: 4602 (Run 11, Clone 58, Gen 42)
Project: 4602 (Run 14, Clone 67, Gen 34)
Project: 4608 (Run 11, Clone 40, Gen 47)
Project: 4607 (Run 1, Clone 87, Gen 36)
Project: 4608 (Run 4, Clone 45, Gen 82)
Project: 4606 (Run 41, Clone 38, Gen 82)
Project: 4624 (Run 17, Clone 88, Gen 45)
Project: 4609 (Run 45, Clone 22, Gen 94)
Project: 4619 (Run 12, Clone 18, Gen 53)
Project: 4624 (Run 21, Clone 34, Gen 71)
Project: 4600 (Run 32, Clone 46, Gen 45)
Project: 4604 (Run 12, Clone 39, Gen 66)
Project: 4607 (Run 14, Clone 29, Gen 84)
Project: 4609 (Run 0, Clone 31, Gen 64)
Project: 4612 (Run 16, Clone 60, Gen 45)
Project: 4625 (Run 26, Clone 71, Gen 53)
Project: 4612 (Run 8, Clone 38, Gen 60)
Project: 4626 (Run 24, Clone 40, Gen 69)
Project: 4600 (Run 44, Clone 7, Gen 87)
Project: 4603 (Run 7, Clone 36, Gen 56)
Project: 4602 (Run 21, Clone 42, Gen 57)
Project: 4602 (Run 27, Clone 56, Gen 58)
Project: 4606 (Run 26, Clone 31, Gen 45)
Project: 4601 (Run 36, Clone 37, Gen 44)
Project: 4624 (Run 44, Clone 37, Gen 67)
Project: 4610 (Run 4, Clone 33, Gen 51)
Project: 4602 (Run 1, Clone 82, Gen 22)
Project: 4601 (Run 10, Clone 46, Gen 42)
Project: 4609 (Run 9, Clone 36, Gen 60)
Project: 4619 (Run 7, Clone 4, Gen 78)
Project: 4620 (Run 5, Clone 35, Gen 84)
Project: 4606 (Run 41, Clone 32, Gen 82)
Project: 4607 (Run 29, Clone 50, Gen 78)
Project: 4608 (Run 24, Clone 39, Gen 65)
Project: 4600 (Run 38, Clone 41, Gen 46)
Project: 4614 (Run 21, Clone 34, Gen 65)
Project: 4619 (Run 19, Clone 2, Gen 56)
Project: 4624 (Run 21, Clone 35, Gen 71)
Project: 4619 (Run 0, Clone 73, Gen 41)
Project: 4619 (Run 11, Clone 21, Gen 76)
Project: 4601 (Run 36, Clone 47, Gen 44)

Posted: **Sun Dec 13, 2009 1:18 am**

Here's my hardware specs ...

#1 - Dell Inspiron E530s, Pentium Dual Core E2160, 1GB RAM, Windows Vista Basic, dual CPU clients
#2 - Whitebox, Gigabyte GA-G31M-ES2L mobo, Pentium Dual Core E5200, 2GB RAM, Windows XP Pro SP3, dual CPU clients
#3 - Whitebox, Asus A7S8X-MX mobo, AMD Sempron 2500+, 1 GB RAM, Windows XP Home SP3, single CPU client

Everything is running stock, no OC'ing or tricks whatsoever.

Posted: **Sun Dec 13, 2009 1:30 am**

Hmmm. You do complete some of them. Your most recent WUs got full credit.
119.3 2009-12-12 12:06:45 4619 8 62 83
119.3 2009-12-12 12:06:45 4615 13 128 14
47.0 2009-12-12 16:04:32 4602 10 81 36
119.3 2009-12-12 16:04:32 4619 17 77 40

Any idea what's different about them?

Posted: **Sun Dec 13, 2009 1:50 am**

I've completed hundreds of Amber units on these machines over the past few weeks.

Has anyone returned these failed units successfully?

If so, I'll chalk it up to a hardware or network glitch.
If not, these units are faulty and need to be stopped.

Posted: **Sun Dec 13, 2009 7:03 pm**

AgrFan --

I'll look into it. Usually our servers stop work on unstable WUs, but perhaps something is going wrong. I'll check it out as soon as I can. --Vince

Posted: **Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:41 pm**

AgrFan wrote: Project: 4608 (Run 24, Clone 39, Gen 65)

That's mine! That's mine!

Code: Select all

[02:34:22] - Preparing to get new work unit...
[02:34:22] + Attempting to get work packet
[02:34:22] - Connecting to assignment server
[02:34:22] Connecting to http://assign.stanford.edu:8080/
[02:34:24] Posted data.
[02:34:24] Initial: E6A9; - Successful: assigned to (169.230.26.30).
[02:34:24] + News From Folding@Home: Welcome to Folding@Home
[02:34:24] Loaded queue successfully.
[02:34:24] Connecting to http://169.230.26.30:8080/
[02:34:25] Posted data.
[02:34:25] Initial: 0000; - Receiving payload (expected size: 18986)
[02:34:26] - Downloaded at ~18 kB/s
[02:34:26] - Averaged speed for that direction ~18 kB/s
[02:34:26] + Received work.
[02:34:26] Trying to send all finished work units
[02:34:26] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[02:34:26] + Closed connections
[02:34:31] 
[02:34:31] + Processing work unit
[02:34:31] Core required: FahCore_82.exe
[02:34:31] Core found.
[02:34:31] Working on Unit 09 [December 12 02:34:31]
[02:34:31] + Working ...
[02:34:31] - Calling './FahCore_82.exe -dir work/ -suffix 09 -checkpoint 15 -verbose -lifeline 2794 -version 602'

[02:34:31] 
[02:34:31] *------------------------------*
[02:34:31] Folding@Home PMD Core
[02:34:31] Version 1.03 (September 7, 2005)
[02:34:31] 
[02:34:31] Preparing to commence simulation
[02:34:31] - Looking at optimizations...
[02:34:31] - Created dyn
[02:34:31] - Files status OK
[02:34:31] - Expanded 18474 -> 121383 (decompressed 657.0 percent)
[02:34:31] 
[02:34:31] Project: 4608 (Run 24, Clone 39, Gen 65)
[02:34:31] 
[02:34:31] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[02:34:31] Entering M.D.
[02:34:37] Going to send back what have done.
[02:34:37] logfile size: 5649
[02:34:37] - Writing 6169 bytes of core data to disk...
[02:34:37]   ... Done.
[02:34:37] 
[02:34:37] Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END
[02:34:38] CoreStatus = 72 (114)
[02:34:38] Sending work to server
[02:34:38] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976.


[02:34:38] + Attempting to send results
[02:34:38] - Reading file work/wuresults_09.dat from core
[02:34:38]   (Read 6169 bytes from disk)
[02:34:38] Connecting to http://169.230.26.30:8080/
[02:34:39] Posted data.
[02:34:39] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~7 kB/s
[02:34:39] - Averaged speed for that direction ~11 kB/s
[02:34:39] + Results successfully sent
[02:34:39] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.

BTW, this '4608 (Run 24, Clone 39, Gen 65)' was second among three in that run of EUEs.

Folding Forum

Immediate EUEs with P46xx WUs

Immediate EUEs with P46xx WUs

Re: Immediate EUEs with P46xx WUs

Re: Immediate EUEs with P46xx WUs

Re: Immediate EUEs with P46xx WUs

Re: Immediate EUEs with P46xx WUs

Re: Immediate EUEs with P46xx WUs