Page 1 of 2
					
				Folding on a 486
				Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:07 pm
				by LoserDave
				
			 
			
					
				Re: Folding on a 486
				Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:23 pm
				by toTOW
				Something is wrong ... no image to see ...
			 
			
					
				Re: Folding on a 486
				Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:29 pm
				by 7im
				
			 
			
					
				Re: Folding on a 486
				Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:34 pm
				by toTOW
				
 that's better 
 
edit : I corrected the image tag ...
 
			
					
				Re: Folding on a 486
				Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:12 am
				by Noegzit
				I guess the 486 SX's  (25 or 33 MHz, no coprocessor) would be rather low on ppds compared to the big bro's DX2 and DX4 (66 and 100 MHz, coprocessor).
			 
			
					
				Re: Folding on a 486
				Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 1:41 pm
				by uncle fuzzy
				Am I the only one to catch the pun? 
 
 
"Folding" (a piece of paper) on a (several) 486(s).
 
			
					
				Re: Folding on a 486
				Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 3:04 pm
				by Brazos
				I thought it was pretty funny.
			 
			
					
				Re: Folding on a 486
				Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 4:59 pm
				by toTOW
				uncle fuzzy wrote:Am I the only one to catch the pun? 

 
I saw it too ... it's a good joke imho 

 
			
					
				Re: Folding on a 486
				Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 6:56 pm
				by John Naylor
				Yeah I got it too 

 
			
					
				Re: Folding on a 486
				Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 9:24 pm
				by divery4eyes
				there is a joke here?
i thought he was actually thinking about folding on a 486 
 
 
what does a piece of paper have to do with folding
ha ha just joking 
 
   
  
 
			
					
				Re: Folding on a 486
				Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:45 pm
				by chumbucket843
				that was an amazing cpu back in its day.
			 
			
					
				Re: Folding on a 486
				Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 12:00 am
				by uncle fuzzy
				I missed it. I jumped from a 386SX to an AMD 586.
Still, a great sight gag.
			 
			
					
				Re: Folding on a 486
				Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 7:44 pm
				by ran
				Somehow this was expected. I mean,
			 
			
					
				Re: Folding on a 486
				Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:41 pm
				by codysluder
				Yep.  Good joke.
Noegzit wrote:I guess the 486 SX's  (25 or 33 MHz, no coprocessor) would be rather low on ppds compared to the big bro's DX2 and DX4 (66 and 100 MHz, coprocessor).
  Nope.  The PPD would be zero because you need about 400-500 MHz 
and a coprocessor to meet the deadline.
 
			
					
				Re: Folding on a 486
				Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:55 am
				by alancabler
				...and SSE