Want to set up folding farm with older cpus
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 4:05 am
Hi, I'm trying to set up a folding farm with older PCs/Macs. When I say older cpus, I mean early PIVs, PIIIs, perhaps PIIs and PIs, and their Mac equivalents. In regard to hardware and network setup, I plan to put linux distros on the comps I get, and set some up as terminals (using LTSP) if they don't have an HD, or as stand-alone 'desktops' if they have an HD.
My question is this: which clients should I use and how should I config them? With the older Macs, I plan to use v5.02 as the cpus are all PPCs. Although if I'm running a linux distro on it (for example, debian), should I use a linux client instead? In regard to the PCs, which will all be running linux (most likely debian or ubuntu), should I use an older Linux client such as v5.04, or the newest client? How should I config all of these clients as well?
I know F@H used to have deadlineless WUs, but afaik that's a thing of the past. However, I'd hate to see older hardware have to end up in the landfill over being used for science because there are no WUs that it can crunch. Any suggestions on how I should config the various switches and options? Or if I just set the defaults, will the server send 'appropriate' WUs (ie, ones that the machine can complete in a reasonable time)?
Thanks for the help, and if this is in the wrong board, I apologize, but it didn't seem appropriate to go into a client version-specific board. Also, please don't reply with suggestions of buy/acquire newer hardware and build a farm from newer/faster machines. If Pandegroup has made specific choices in terms of their scientific research and the breakdown of that research into WUs to not support AT ALL older machines, please let me know that and, as much as I'll be disappointed, any machines I acquire that are below the min requirements I will junk. But I'm referring to replies where the poster can't conceive why I would want to use old hardware and thinks the only way to run a farm is to get new hardware. I'm not opposed to acquiring newer/faster hardware as part of my farm. But my desire is to use machines that nobody wants anymore, whether they be old or new, and utilise them for science instead of just junking them.
Thanks.
My question is this: which clients should I use and how should I config them? With the older Macs, I plan to use v5.02 as the cpus are all PPCs. Although if I'm running a linux distro on it (for example, debian), should I use a linux client instead? In regard to the PCs, which will all be running linux (most likely debian or ubuntu), should I use an older Linux client such as v5.04, or the newest client? How should I config all of these clients as well?
I know F@H used to have deadlineless WUs, but afaik that's a thing of the past. However, I'd hate to see older hardware have to end up in the landfill over being used for science because there are no WUs that it can crunch. Any suggestions on how I should config the various switches and options? Or if I just set the defaults, will the server send 'appropriate' WUs (ie, ones that the machine can complete in a reasonable time)?
Thanks for the help, and if this is in the wrong board, I apologize, but it didn't seem appropriate to go into a client version-specific board. Also, please don't reply with suggestions of buy/acquire newer hardware and build a farm from newer/faster machines. If Pandegroup has made specific choices in terms of their scientific research and the breakdown of that research into WUs to not support AT ALL older machines, please let me know that and, as much as I'll be disappointed, any machines I acquire that are below the min requirements I will junk. But I'm referring to replies where the poster can't conceive why I would want to use old hardware and thinks the only way to run a farm is to get new hardware. I'm not opposed to acquiring newer/faster hardware as part of my farm. But my desire is to use machines that nobody wants anymore, whether they be old or new, and utilise them for science instead of just junking them.
Thanks.