Bruce: Thanks for the link to Dr. Pande's vision. I've just read it and it's reinforced something I've been thinking more and more over the last year.
His vision is all about the science, the math, the technology. It's good to be thinking about those things. But it's all useless unless you have the donors motivated to commit time, energy and resources to the FAH cause.
My motivation (and I suspect the motivation of many of the FAH donors) dwindles:
- every time I've got to check my stats to find out that something has gone off the rails, sometimes days ago and my machine has been idle
- every time I've got to check the boards to try to figure out what's gone off the rails, is it:
- just a glitch in the stats system?
- malfunctioning assignment or work servers?
- no WU's for my particular configuration?
- bad hardware or software on my machines?
- bad WU's?
- every time my stats
http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/ ... =&u=114950 take a jump / dive when I've not changed a thing with my hardware or time devoted to FAH
If administrators of the FAH infrastructure don't appear to care enough about the donors, or at minimum provide a way to keep donors proactively informed about what's happing, the goal of getting 1,000,000 is a lofty and unattainable dream.
Perhaps FAH admin could engage behavioural science to help identify the things that will motivate donors to join and engage with FAH.
You are right that
writing software that would be more intelligent that that human isn't feasible.
. But it doesn't take a big leap in programming to come up with a mechanism to notify donors (if they subscribe to it) that something has gone untoward that's affecting their contributions to FAH.