Re: Configurable affinity changer for Windows
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 12:30 am
Yeah, make sense. I missed that section so I made assumptions instead
Community driven support forum for Folding@home
https://foldingforum.org/
Code: Select all
C:\PathToGPUClient\FahCore_*.exe := CPU0
Code: Select all
C:\PathToWindowsSMPClient\FahCore_*.exe := CPU1+CPU2+CPU3
Code: Select all
C:\PathToWindowsSMPClient\FahCore_*.exe := CPU1+CPU2+CPU3 [assign=1,resource=CPUUSE,policy=PSEUDOBALANCED]
Code: Select all
C:\PathToWindowsSMPClient\FahCore_*.exe := CPU1+CPU1+CPU1+CPU2+CPU2+CPU2+CPU3+CPU3+CPU3+CPU1+CPU2+CPU3 [assign=3,resource=CPUUSE,policy=PSEUDOBALANCED]
Code: Select all
C:\PathToGPUClient\FahCore_*.exe := CPU0 [priority=BelowNormal]
Code: Select all
C:\PathToWindowsSMPClient\FahCore_*.exe := CPU1+CPU1+CPU1+CPU1+CPU2+CPU2+CPU2+CPU2+CPU3+CPU3+CPU3+CPU3+CPU0+CPU1+CPU2+CPU3 [assign=4,resource=CPUUSE,policy=PSEUDOBALANCED,priority=idle]
Yes, that is fine. I print that warning in case somebody inadvertently lists the same CPU multiple times for one application profile. It is legal however to list the same CPU multiple times in case one needs to write profiles where processes get allocated different numbers of CPUs, as in your case.BrgHW wrote: There is a warning, and i'm not shure of what i'm doing
Have I done somting wrong or is it OK??
Code: Select all
G:\Programfiler\Folding@home\Folding@home-gpu*\FahCore_*.exe := CPU0
Code: Select all
PathToGPUClient1\FahCore_*.exe := CPU0 [priority=belownormal]
PathToGPUClient2\FahCore_*.exe := CPU1 [priority=belownormal]
PathToGPUClient3\FahCore_*.exe := CPU2 [priority=belownormal]
PathToSMPClient\FahCore_*.exe := CPU3+CPU3+CPU3+CPU0+CPU1+CPU2+CPU0+CPU1+CPU2+CPU0+CPU1+CPU2 [assign=3,resource=cpuuse,policy=pseudobalanced,priority=idle]
Code: Select all
*\FahCore_11.exe := CPU0+CPU1+CPU2 [assign=1,resource=cpuuse,policy=pseudobalanced,priority=belownormal]
PathToSMPClient\FahCore_*.exe := CPU3+CPU2+CPU1+CPU0 [assign=1,resource=cpuuse,policy=pseudobalanced,priority=idle]
I'm afraid, I do not have any Vista PC around. My company is on XP totally. My home PC runs XP also. The reason to require "service" version is to hide it at all also. I've got non-SMP clients running as services and users even don't know about it. If it is 2 Core PC and I run 2 such the clients simultaneously, your tool is usefull already. And even if I want to keep one of cores only for folding then I can use it. But I don't need the headache to explain to all these people what the new hell is sitting in the tray. Here are my reasons and I'm definitely ready to beta test itbaobab wrote:Aleksey, over the past week I've been working on a sys-tray version of the program. It is not a service, but it can be hidden from the taskbar.
The tray version is not quite finished yet, but it is not far off either. I want to release it roughly a week from now.
I am looking for somebody to test it in Vista sometime next week before I release it though.