Re: Difference : Timeout and Expiration date
Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:11 pm
The version of the F@H client is 7.6.21 installed two days ago and that allowed to detect the CUDA platform and to use it even if the performances remained the same.
The NVIDIA driver version is 496.13 downloaded and installed two days ago via GeForce Experience from the NVIDIA website.
GPU-Z confirms version 496.13 as reported by GeForce Experience.
The Notebook is working, with F@H, 24 hours a day without interruption.
However, in spite of all this, the Work Units that I have been assigned, for a few months now, very often require more processing time than the timeout.
My question is :
Why, under the same conditions, was I processing 50/70 WU per month last year and less than 20 this year?
Perhaps the calculations have become so heavy that a three-year-old notebook has become obsolete?
I think it would be useful to know so as to avoid wasting time unnecessarily, wasting electricity and causing the PC to die prematurely.
Translated from Italian with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
The NVIDIA driver version is 496.13 downloaded and installed two days ago via GeForce Experience from the NVIDIA website.
GPU-Z confirms version 496.13 as reported by GeForce Experience.
The Notebook is working, with F@H, 24 hours a day without interruption.
However, in spite of all this, the Work Units that I have been assigned, for a few months now, very often require more processing time than the timeout.
My question is :
Why, under the same conditions, was I processing 50/70 WU per month last year and less than 20 this year?
Perhaps the calculations have become so heavy that a three-year-old notebook has become obsolete?
I think it would be useful to know so as to avoid wasting time unnecessarily, wasting electricity and causing the PC to die prematurely.
Translated from Italian with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)