Bigadv points change

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

derrickmcc
Posts: 221
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 12:30 am
Hardware configuration: 2 x GTX 460 (825/1600/1650)
AMD Athlon II X2 250 3.0Ghz
Kingston 2Gb DDR2 1066 Mhz
MSI K9A2 Platinum
Western Digital 500Gb Sata II
LiteOn DVD
Coolermaster 900W UCP
Antec 902
Windows XP SP3
Location: Malvern, UK

Re: Bigadv points change

Post by derrickmcc »

noorman wrote:.
Again, GPU3 or otherwise has nothing to do with Bigadv
Ok, so you are comparing bigadv with ... what?

What are you going to do with your points?
Image
joeyg
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 11:01 pm

Re: Bigadv points change

Post by joeyg »

I've never gotten upset about points changes or the QMD issue before, but this one does disturb me. I pay for my addiction out of "Mad" money or pay bonuses, that's sort of why its never bothered me before. Don't get me wrong, my purchase decisions are carefully thought out to get me the most points for my buck, with an understanding that more points meant more contributions to the project. I know a lot of my teammates spend more than "Mad" money and are more dedicated than I, and that's what is most upsetting. It absolutely kills me that people who've invested in SR-2's, i7-970's, water cooling, etc to specifically build folding computers are having the contributions devalued. They've chosen to give up other things in life to do this, and I really don't think the decision makers considered this.
noorman
Posts: 270
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 2:26 pm
Hardware configuration: Folders: Intel C2D E6550 @ 3.150 GHz + GPU XFX 9800GTX+ @ 765 MHZ w. WinXP-GPU
AMD A2X64 3800+ @ stock + GPU XFX 9800GTX+ @ 775 MHZ w. WinXP-GPU
Main rig: an old Athlon Barton 2500+ @2.25 GHz & 2* 512 MB RAM Apacer, Radeon 9800Pro, WinXP SP3+
Location: Belgium, near the International Sea-Port of Antwerp

Re: Bigadv points change

Post by noorman »

derrickmcc wrote:
noorman wrote:.
Again, GPU3 or otherwise has nothing to do with Bigadv
Ok, so you are comparing bigadv with ... what?

What are you going to do with your points?
.

Comparing with what we used to get, simple ...

.
- stopped Linux SMP w. HT on i7-860@3.5 GHz
....................................
Folded since 10-06-04 till 09-2010
k1wi
Posts: 909
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:48 pm

Re: Bigadv points change

Post by k1wi »

noorman wrote:.

Again, GPU3 or otherwise has nothing to do with Bigadv

If Bigadv guns for more CPU cores, a donor wanting to Fold Bigadv has no choice but to invest in a suitable CPU and matching mainboard (certain makers like to switch to another socket for a new CPU family)
At that time he does that in the knowledge of a certain yield for said hardware and investment.
Now, after considerable time, he gets less for what is costing him more in the meantime ... (being higher power bills, mainly)

The demands for RAM may be flexible in PG's software (better use of RAM f.e.), a donor hasn't that flexibility with his purchased hardware (though). If demand has diminished, he can't return half of his purchase to correct and save ...

.
You can't return the science done either.

You seem to be suggesting that PG either should never have released the initial BigAdv wu's with their higher RAM usage, or they should never have released a new, more ram efficient core. Progress is what progress is. Bigadv is experimental, it is basically a public beta and it always has been, therefore you expect that it can change. I am pretty sure PG made that clear all along. Are you challenging that?

Bigadv is still offered a 'premium', that does not change with this. ALL that has changed is that the premium is slightly smaller. In my opinion, the premium has continued longer than it should have - the work units that used less ram should have always had a smaller premium.

@joeyg, I am sorry, but people SR-2's will still make massive points - Quick Return Bonus is still in effect and still promotes fewer, faster machines. Is 50,000 ppd really that much worse than 60,000 ppd? Per watt or per dollar 'invested' upfront it is still a ton better than GPU or regular SMP or uni-proc.
Image
noorman
Posts: 270
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 2:26 pm
Hardware configuration: Folders: Intel C2D E6550 @ 3.150 GHz + GPU XFX 9800GTX+ @ 765 MHZ w. WinXP-GPU
AMD A2X64 3800+ @ stock + GPU XFX 9800GTX+ @ 775 MHZ w. WinXP-GPU
Main rig: an old Athlon Barton 2500+ @2.25 GHz & 2* 512 MB RAM Apacer, Radeon 9800Pro, WinXP SP3+
Location: Belgium, near the International Sea-Port of Antwerp

Re: Bigadv points change

Post by noorman »

k1wi wrote: You can't return the science done either.

You seem to be suggesting that PG either should never have released the initial BigAdv wu's with their higher RAM usage, or they should never have released a new, more ram efficient core. Progress is what progress is. Bigadv is experimental, it is basically a public beta and it always has been, therefore you expect that it can change. I am pretty sure PG made that clear all along. Are you challenging that?

Bigadv is still offered a 'premium', that does not change with this. ALL that has changed is that the premium is slightly smaller. In my opinion, the premium has continued longer than it should have - the work units that used less ram should have always had a smaller premium.

@joeyg, I am sorry, but people SR-2's will still make massive points - Quick Return Bonus is still in effect and still promotes fewer, faster machines. Is 50,000 ppd really that much worse than 60,000 ppd? Per watt or per dollar 'invested' upfront it is still a ton better than GPU or regular SMP or uni-proc.
I 'm suggesting they leave the credits (well) alone; in the past, this has been shown to be divisive that they should think more than twice before tampering with an existing setup.
It 's always been a hornet's nest. If the difference isn't that much, in your opinion, then it can be left as is too.

.
- stopped Linux SMP w. HT on i7-860@3.5 GHz
....................................
Folded since 10-06-04 till 09-2010
Jester
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 1:03 pm

Re: Bigadv points change

Post by Jester »

The problem I have with the current changes is that there was little of the current "interest" in Bigadv bonus points until a new batch was released to beta
that had the potential for widening the gap even further,
As they are "Linux only" and I run all mine under Win I don't see why the discontent, rightly or wrongly, should have any bearing on what I've been folding
for the last six months or so, releasing them from closed beta before taking into account the probable backlash didn't help matters either,
and don't worry, I've heard all the rhetoric of "it's a beta project" and "don't base hardware on current production", but how many have purchased an Nvidia
card for a machine over an ATi one based at least a little on Folding production ?
If you want to play the ppd/$$ game the SR-2 is being devalued, as a modest pair of X58/hexcore Cpu systems will give similar production in ppd at less cost,
but isn't the whole idea of the Bigadv project and it's bonus points fast return times ?
joeyg
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 11:01 pm

Re: Bigadv points change

Post by joeyg »

k1wi wrote:
@joeyg, I am sorry, but people SR-2's will still make massive points - Quick Return Bonus is still in effect and still promotes fewer, faster machines. Is 50,000 ppd really that much worse than 60,000 ppd? Per watt or per dollar 'invested' upfront it is still a ton better than GPU or regular SMP or uni-proc.
Understood, but those 10,000 points may have been part of the contributor's purchase / build criteria.
P5-133XL
Posts: 2948
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:36 am
Hardware configuration: Machine #1:

Intel Q9450; 2x2GB=8GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460; Windows Server 2008 X64 (SP1).

Machine #2:

Intel Q6600; 2x2GB=4GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460 video card; Windows 7 X64.

Machine 3:

Dell Dimension 8400, 3.2GHz P4 4x512GB Ram, Video card GTX 460, Windows 7 X32

I am currently folding just on the 5x GTX 460's for aprox. 70K PPD
Location: Salem. OR USA

Re: Bigadv points change

Post by P5-133XL »

Guys,

I understand that you folks don't like that you are getting fewer points for the same amount of work. That being said, Stanford is just reacting to the demands of their constituents complaining that with these big rigs capable of getting 250,000+ PPD make their contribution feel worthless -- See: viewtopic.php?f=16&t=18797. You just didn't represent yourselves well in the discussion.

I'm sure that you won't like it but I think your complaining now is a bit too late. You all should have been more pro-active and participated in the thread to counter their arguments at the time. No disrespect intended, but complaining after the fact just makes you all seem like little children whining when something didn't go your way.
Image
derrickmcc
Posts: 221
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 12:30 am
Hardware configuration: 2 x GTX 460 (825/1600/1650)
AMD Athlon II X2 250 3.0Ghz
Kingston 2Gb DDR2 1066 Mhz
MSI K9A2 Platinum
Western Digital 500Gb Sata II
LiteOn DVD
Coolermaster 900W UCP
Antec 902
Windows XP SP3
Location: Malvern, UK

Re: Bigadv points change

Post by derrickmcc »

Jester wrote:If you want to play the ppd/$$ game the SR-2 is being devalued, as a modest pair of X58/hexcore Cpu systems will give similar production in ppd at less cost,
but isn't the whole idea of the Bigadv project and it's bonus points fast return times ?
Both the SR-2 and the X58/hexcore Cpu systems will have similar reductions in points for bigadv, so the SR-2 is not being devalued in that sense.

The rationale for reducing the bigadv bonus is :
We would like to continue to offer a bonus for bigadv ..., but we don't want demand for bigadv to overwhelm the rest of the project or imbalance the points system.
If you read the original announcement in full: http://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=19059
you will see that PG are:
considering renormalizing other parts of the system but have not finalized decisions in that regard.
so bigadv is not the only class of WU that will be affected, it is just the first.
Image
Jester
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 1:03 pm

Re: Bigadv points change

Post by Jester »

P5-133XL wrote:Guys,

I understand that you folks don't like that you are getting fewer points for the same amount of work. That being said, Stanford is just reacting to the demands of their constituents complaining that with these big rigs capable of getting 250,000+ PPD make their contribution feel worthless -- See: viewtopic.php?f=16&t=18797. You just didn't represent yourselves well in the discussion.

I'm sure that you won't like it but I think your complaining now is a bit too late. You all should have been more pro-active and participated in the thread to counter their arguments at the time. No disrespect intended, but complaining after the fact just makes you all seem like little children whining when something didn't go your way.
I though this should've been clear enough:
viewtopic.php?p=190061#p190061
But by then it was all about theoretic formulae...
and the majority of the 18 pages there whining about "these 250k ppd Bigadv Wu's" that I can't and don't fold anyway,
As I said earlier, they should've been left in closed beta until the ramifications of their huge ppd and the potential negative
impact on "other" folders could be more carefully considered,
The beta team does deserve a few "carrots" now and then for the work they do "behind the scenes", and I'm sure few would
begrudge the odd "perk" along the way...
Jester
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 1:03 pm

Re: Bigadv points change

Post by Jester »

derrickmcc wrote:
Jester wrote:If you want to play the ppd/$$ game the SR-2 is being devalued, as a modest pair of X58/hexcore Cpu systems will give similar production in ppd at less cost,
but isn't the whole idea of the Bigadv project and it's bonus points fast return times ?
Both the SR-2 and the X58/hexcore Cpu systems will have similar reductions in points for bigadv, so the SR-2 is not being devalued in that sense.The rationale for reducing the bigadv bonus is :
We would like to continue to offer a bonus for bigadv ..., but we don't want demand for bigadv to overwhelm the rest of the project or imbalance the points system.
If you read the original announcement in full: http://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=19059
you will see that PG are:
considering renormalizing other parts of the system but have not finalized decisions in that regard.
so bigadv is not the only class of WU that will be affected, it is just the first.

With the bonus multiplier based on return time staying the same and the base value being reduced ? hardly needs a calculator...
HaloJones
Posts: 906
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 10:16 am

Re: Bigadv points change

Post by HaloJones »

I'll wait to see what difference this makes before making sweeping statements.
single 1070

Image
HaloJones
Posts: 906
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 10:16 am

Re: point system is getting ridiculous...

Post by HaloJones »

I followed the whole of this 18-page discussion as it happened but felt no particular desire to comment. Does the silence mean I agreed with the need to change or that I didn't understand the need for the discussion in the first place? In fact it was the latter. If someone builds a machine that can get 1000000 ppd, why should I feel angry? Jealous, of course but angry?

I don't see why this needs to change. If folders with single-core machines are feeling devalued, why? Their contribution has never changed. They're doing the same science and getting the same points. If that science has become less useful because all the kewl stuff is being done with bigadv, they should be grateful the science they do hasn't been terminated.
single 1070

Image
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Bigadv points change

Post by bruce »

noorman wrote:.

It 's more and more becoming a question of yield versus costs and no-one likes to get less for 'his money'.
The big commercial players in this world do enough of that day in day out.
Selling us stuff for the same price, but secretly lessening the amount of 'stuff' you get for it!
It 's hidden and many don't notice; F@H is openly, without wider consultation and ignoring polls on the issue, downgrading credits that have been there for a long time.
This is untimely.
It also doesn't take in to account the ever increasing costs (for donors) to run their systems, mainly the energy bills.
For that reason alone, things should be left as they were.
On top of those, there are the ever returning costs for hardware upgrades if one wants to keep up with 'progress'.
The donor is already 'paying' more for those credits than a year or 2 ago, solely with his higher power bills.
It 's because of expenses/costs that I had to quit F@H after 6 years of continuous Folding ...

This kind of degrading is discouraging, to say the least.

.
I disagree. FAH didn't change -- your perception has changed.

Buy a used 2.8GHz P4 and run it just like you did 5 years ago and you can still earn 110 PPD for the same power costs that you spent then. That's still part of the basic definition of what one point is worth. Buy 200 of them and the power it takes to run them and the power to cool your room and FAH will let you earn exactly 22K PPD just like you could when that hardware was new. What's not fair about that? In fact, you'd be getting a bargain if you consider what you'd be paying for that hardware compared to when it was new.

Now tell me how to reconcile that with the gripes about points in this topic.
Jester
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 1:03 pm

Re: Bigadv points change

Post by Jester »

bruce wrote:
noorman wrote:.

It 's more and more becoming a question of yield versus costs and no-one likes to get less for 'his money'.
The big commercial players in this world do enough of that day in day out.
Selling us stuff for the same price, but secretly lessening the amount of 'stuff' you get for it!
It 's hidden and many don't notice; F@H is openly, without wider consultation and ignoring polls on the issue, downgrading credits that have been there for a long time.
This is untimely.
It also doesn't take in to account the ever increasing costs (for donors) to run their systems, mainly the energy bills.
For that reason alone, things should be left as they were.
On top of those, there are the ever returning costs for hardware upgrades if one wants to keep up with 'progress'.
The donor is already 'paying' more for those credits than a year or 2 ago, solely with his higher power bills.
It 's because of expenses/costs that I had to quit F@H after 6 years of continuous Folding ...

This kind of degrading is discouraging, to say the least.

.
I disagree. FAH didn't change -- your perception has changed.

Buy a used 2.8GHz P4 and run it just like you did 5 years ago and you can still earn 110 PPD for the same power costs that you spent then. That's still part of the basic definition of what one point is worth. Buy 200 of them and the power it takes to run them and the power to cool your room and FAH will let you earn exactly 22K PPD just like you could when that hardware was new. What's not fair about that? In fact, you'd be getting a bargain if you consider what you'd be paying for that hardware compared to when it was new.

Now tell me how to reconcile that with the gripes about points in this topic.
I'd love to live where you do Bruce,
My power costs have risen per Kw/h close to 50% in the last three years alone....
My income ?, maybe 10% tops.... :cry:
Post Reply