
How to restructure multiple users from V7 to V8
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
-
- Posts: 1722
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:22 pm
- Hardware configuration: 9950x, 7950x3D, 5950x, 5800x3D
7900xtx, RX9070, Radeon 7, 5700xt, 6900xt, RX 550 640SP - Location: London
- Contact:
Re: How to restructure multiple users from V7 to V8
Windows time sync is notoriously horrible 

-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2020 2:55 pm
- Hardware configuration: HP Z600 (5) HP Z800 (3) HP Z440 (3)
ASUS Turbo GTX 1060, 1070, 1080, RTX 2060 (3)
Dell GTX 1080 - Location: Sydney Australia
Re: How to restructure multiple users from V7 to V8
When I ask the multiverse - but excuse me a mo, my little red Nokia 2660 is telling me it is 8PM, and thus the time when electricity is semi-cheap at "shoulder" rates for 2 hours followed by 9 hours of "off peak" followed by 7 more hours of "shoulder", and so it is time to start Z441, Z442 and Z443 on another exciting 11-hour+"Finish and Stop") journey through FaHspace. Will edit the rest in later.
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2020 2:55 pm
- Hardware configuration: HP Z600 (5) HP Z800 (3) HP Z440 (3)
ASUS Turbo GTX 1060, 1070, 1080, RTX 2060 (3)
Dell GTX 1080 - Location: Sydney Australia
Re: How to restructure multiple users from V7 to V8
When I ask the Multiverse about the notoriously horrible status of Windows time, it leads me into the usual swamp that can be summarised as "sometimes". So I am not going there. All the devices are synching via Windows, except the air-gapped one that I plan to use after the collapse of cyberspace. [For details see https://www.nationalacademies.org/news/ ... bercrimes ]
For the avoidance of doubt, I am not saying that V8.4.9 Finish doesn't complete an ongoing WU. It does. The issue is that in some cases it doesn't STOP with an empty in-tray, but seeks out another WU. Which may not matter much if your ETAs are measured in seconds, but is expensive if they are measured in hours and take you into more expensive electricity rates.
OK, the only setup difference I noticed, as between Z805 (which seemed to Stop as requested after Finishing) and those devices that did not, was the fact that Z805 had been told to go to sleep after 30 mins of inactivity, while the others were all set to "Never". I have just verified with Z805 that these settings do not put it to sleep while a GPU-WU is running, since the WU has progressed over the last 3 hours it has been left alone. I doubt that the post-Fah-finish/pre-W10-sleep time of 30 minutes vs Never could be the reason why Z805 Stopped folding and the others went off to grab another WU, since 30 minutes is plenty of time to find a WU for a GTX1080. Nevertheless, I am replicating with another WU on Z805, and also I found that I had left 8.4.9 (de-linked) on Z802 (CPU only) so I set Z802 to sleep after 30 mins of inactivity and it is running with a CPU WU and all 24 Threads.
[I note in passing that this beautiful top-of-the-2011-line Z800 has 2x Xeon X5690s and 192GB of RAM because STATA16(SE) works fastest if you can fit the whole data-set into RAM, but unfortunately it guzzles too much electricity to make 100K-odd PPD from the CPUs a good return on investment. I only run it now and then to keep the spiders out.]
Apart from that, I now have 8.4.9 running CPU WUs in "Finish" mode on Z601, Z604, and Z605 with their previous settings so we'll see if they STOP or continue on to seek out another WU.
For the avoidance of doubt, I am not saying that V8.4.9 Finish doesn't complete an ongoing WU. It does. The issue is that in some cases it doesn't STOP with an empty in-tray, but seeks out another WU. Which may not matter much if your ETAs are measured in seconds, but is expensive if they are measured in hours and take you into more expensive electricity rates.
OK, the only setup difference I noticed, as between Z805 (which seemed to Stop as requested after Finishing) and those devices that did not, was the fact that Z805 had been told to go to sleep after 30 mins of inactivity, while the others were all set to "Never". I have just verified with Z805 that these settings do not put it to sleep while a GPU-WU is running, since the WU has progressed over the last 3 hours it has been left alone. I doubt that the post-Fah-finish/pre-W10-sleep time of 30 minutes vs Never could be the reason why Z805 Stopped folding and the others went off to grab another WU, since 30 minutes is plenty of time to find a WU for a GTX1080. Nevertheless, I am replicating with another WU on Z805, and also I found that I had left 8.4.9 (de-linked) on Z802 (CPU only) so I set Z802 to sleep after 30 mins of inactivity and it is running with a CPU WU and all 24 Threads.
[I note in passing that this beautiful top-of-the-2011-line Z800 has 2x Xeon X5690s and 192GB of RAM because STATA16(SE) works fastest if you can fit the whole data-set into RAM, but unfortunately it guzzles too much electricity to make 100K-odd PPD from the CPUs a good return on investment. I only run it now and then to keep the spiders out.]
Apart from that, I now have 8.4.9 running CPU WUs in "Finish" mode on Z601, Z604, and Z605 with their previous settings so we'll see if they STOP or continue on to seek out another WU.
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2020 2:55 pm
- Hardware configuration: HP Z600 (5) HP Z800 (3) HP Z440 (3)
ASUS Turbo GTX 1060, 1070, 1080, RTX 2060 (3)
Dell GTX 1080 - Location: Sydney Australia
Re: How to restructure multiple users from V7 to V8
All is good with 8.4.9 Finish and Pause, so far as I can tell after more systematic testing.
I can't quite work out what Smilies to use because I should perhaps be embarrassed too, but I'm not. It was certainly the case previously that Machines I expected to have "finished WU and stopped folding" had taken on new WUs, but presumably that was operator error.
All my specific test jobs with 8.4.9 under W10 finished, and paused patiently for a minimum of 30 minutes without yielding to the temptation to seek out a new WU. This was true when Windows was instructed to send the PC to sleep after 30 mins and (another WU on the same Machine) Never, and with both GPU only or CPU-only jobs. I did not test both CPU and GPU together since normally I only run CPU jobs on devices without Fah-acceptable GPUs.


I can't quite work out what Smilies to use because I should perhaps be embarrassed too, but I'm not. It was certainly the case previously that Machines I expected to have "finished WU and stopped folding" had taken on new WUs, but presumably that was operator error.
All my specific test jobs with 8.4.9 under W10 finished, and paused patiently for a minimum of 30 minutes without yielding to the temptation to seek out a new WU. This was true when Windows was instructed to send the PC to sleep after 30 mins and (another WU on the same Machine) Never, and with both GPU only or CPU-only jobs. I did not test both CPU and GPU together since normally I only run CPU jobs on devices without Fah-acceptable GPUs.
-
- Posts: 1722
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:22 pm
- Hardware configuration: 9950x, 7950x3D, 5950x, 5800x3D
7900xtx, RX9070, Radeon 7, 5700xt, 6900xt, RX 550 640SP - Location: London
- Contact:
Re: How to restructure multiple users from V7 to V8
Please make sure to pause any folding before system restart to not lose any work
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2020 2:55 pm
- Hardware configuration: HP Z600 (5) HP Z800 (3) HP Z440 (3)
ASUS Turbo GTX 1060, 1070, 1080, RTX 2060 (3)
Dell GTX 1080 - Location: Sydney Australia
Re: How to restructure multiple users from V7 to V8
Well, I suppose the 80% complete WU I just dumped by mistake might help me remember this feature of W10 folding, but if it happens again I guess I'll have to put a post-it warning on the screen.Please make sure to pause any folding before system restart to not lose any work

Uncosted Folding ----------------0.218 BP -----------------------------------------(19.03.2020 to 18.06.2022)
Costed Folding Weeks 001-052 1.192 BP @ Delta$=$405.52 = $0.34 per MP (19.06.2022 to 17.06.2023)
Costed Folding Weeks 053-104 0.706 BP @ Delta$=$204.96 = $0.29 per MP (18.06.2023 to 15.06.2024)
Costed Folding Weeks 105-149 1.080 BP @ Delta$=$071.94 - $0.07 per MP (16.06.2024 to 26.04.2025)
I note that these $ are AUD of course, currently = USD 0.64 or =UKP 0.48 or =EUR 0.56.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8118
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
- Hardware configuration: Mac Studio M1 Max 32 GB smp6
Mac Hack i7-7700K 48 GB smp4 - Location: W. MA
Re: How to restructure multiple users from V7 to V8
One thing that has been reported as causing a problem, even if you have the PC syncing time to an external source, is the logic board clock battery. People reported that a dead or dying one caused weird issues.
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2020 2:55 pm
- Hardware configuration: HP Z600 (5) HP Z800 (3) HP Z440 (3)
ASUS Turbo GTX 1060, 1070, 1080, RTX 2060 (3)
Dell GTX 1080 - Location: Sydney Australia
Re: How to restructure multiple users from V7 to V8
I assume that (in my case) we are talking about the CRC2032 button batteries that power the Real Time Clocks in Zx00s. It's true that the puzzling results were from antique Zx00 devices that I tend to run only once a month or so for for Windows and other updates these days. They spend most of their time dreaming of their early life (c2011-2015) as executive desktops that only had to do a bit of Outlook and Word when they lived in air-conditioned offices before being made redundant and ending up on eBay. Over the years since 2016 I have replaced maybe 3 batteries across 10 Zx00 workstations, which is easy enough to do since the Zxx0s were designed for user access - eg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SUjxCX2_Gs - and of course the batteries are in every supermarket on the planet. But if I remember rightly, two of these were rather battered devices that hadn't seen aircon for a long time and whose batteries were DoA.logic board clock battery
In such cases, if it fails completely you get the warning that it has forgotten the time when it boots up. But of course a dying battery might be causing intermittent timing problems problems well before it forgets the time entirely. So while I am staying with "operator error" for now, I'll keep it in mind.
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2020 2:55 pm
- Hardware configuration: HP Z600 (5) HP Z800 (3) HP Z440 (3)
ASUS Turbo GTX 1060, 1070, 1080, RTX 2060 (3)
Dell GTX 1080 - Location: Sydney Australia
Re: How to restructure multiple users from V7 to V8
Why does my 8.4.8 "WU Details" display for an ordinary task running in the background on Z605 Machine and Account Appepi show as a logged credit ...
But never mind - I found the answer here: viewtopic.php?p=368469&hilit=may+includ ... ed#p368469Code User Team Credit Assigned Credited
Ok yoshineko 257728 98,730.8 2025-05-02 08:34:57 2025-05-02 13:41:47
May include credits awarded to other users.