Page 2 of 2
Re: Opening up Folding@Home
Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2020 10:05 pm
by PantherX
michelv wrote:...F@H is one organisation (as far as I see it) with one type of projects (What's in a name)...
I won't call it an organization, rather a consortium:
https://foldingathome.org/about/the-fol ... onsortium/
There are many labs which work together on common issues and problems. My definition of a project would be this:
https://apps.foldingathome.org/psummary
That's a lot of projects. Moreover, the scope of those projects is protein folding and can be narrowed down in some projects to specific diseases:
https://foldingathome.org/diseases/
Re: Opening up Folding@Home
Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:50 pm
by michelv
Well, interesting history.
I think current times are historical as well, with a massive increase of user base.
BOINC aggregated stats:
https://boinc.netsoft-online.com/e107_p ... ?project=1
Re: Opening up Folding@Home
Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2020 3:02 pm
by iceman1992
I think both have their place though, separately.
I'm planning to contribute to Rosetta@Home as well, but my first time running it resulted in a blue screen so I haven't tried again
Re: Opening up Folding@Home
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2020 5:20 am
by michelv
Using the two together on one machine is very tricky. I have never seen a blue screen caused by BOINC apps (BOINC will run the mini programs) but the two compete heavily for the same resources. At this moment there does not seem to be a GPU task on COVID in the BOINC spectrum, my only reason to be here on F@H.
"..., separately."
Yeah, I am from the league "why not work together" but this tends to be (very) old fashion.
Re: Opening up Folding@Home
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2020 7:40 am
by bruce
Many of us are former BOINC participants or even some were part of Seti@home before BOINC acquired that name.