Re: Yet another newbie starter hardware thread...
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2018 5:02 pm
One last thought about where the PPD disparity/bottleneck is coming from.
My motherboard (P4N SLI) only runs PCI-E version 1. Modern boards run PCI-E version 3. Like @Foldy said, PCI-E v3 x4 is bottlnecking high power GPUs on windows but not on linux. So, I did some reading into PCI-Express.
The motherboard I am using is PCI-E v1.
PCI-E v1 is only 2gbps per lane. That's 4 Gigabytes per second in a x16 slot.
PCI-E v2 is doubled at 4gbps per lane, or 8 Gigabytes per second in a x16 slot.
PCI-E v3 is 7.877gbps per lane, or 15.574 gigabytes per second in a x16 slot.
So a PCI-E v1 x16 slot is equal to: PCI-E v2 x8 slot, or PCI-E v3 x4 slot.
So I'm pretty sure we can rule out a PCI-E bottleneck.
What do you guys think?
EDIT: I realize I've gone down the rabbit hole with this LOL. Frankly, I am completely fascinated that a CPU released 13 years ago can pair up with a modern GPU and do so much good work.
My motherboard (P4N SLI) only runs PCI-E version 1. Modern boards run PCI-E version 3. Like @Foldy said, PCI-E v3 x4 is bottlnecking high power GPUs on windows but not on linux. So, I did some reading into PCI-Express.
The motherboard I am using is PCI-E v1.
PCI-E v1 is only 2gbps per lane. That's 4 Gigabytes per second in a x16 slot.
PCI-E v2 is doubled at 4gbps per lane, or 8 Gigabytes per second in a x16 slot.
PCI-E v3 is 7.877gbps per lane, or 15.574 gigabytes per second in a x16 slot.
So a PCI-E v1 x16 slot is equal to: PCI-E v2 x8 slot, or PCI-E v3 x4 slot.
So I'm pretty sure we can rule out a PCI-E bottleneck.
What do you guys think?
EDIT: I realize I've gone down the rabbit hole with this LOL. Frankly, I am completely fascinated that a CPU released 13 years ago can pair up with a modern GPU and do so much good work.