Community driven support forum for Folding@home
https://foldingforum.org/
http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/ ... =&u=5500747im wrote:When the PPD numbers are being quoted here, are these numbers from a 24 hour period?
What is the PPD from each machine when you look at a week's worth of folding?
PPD can very quite a bit if one machine gets a -bigadv work unit, and the second machine does not and folds a regular SMP work unit instead.
I've looked at PPD over a long period of time. I check on boxes daily with FahSpy and they have been running for over a month, it has been like that since day one.7im wrote:When the PPD numbers are being quoted here, are these numbers from a 24 hour period?
What is the PPD from each machine when you look at a week's worth of folding?
PPD can very quite a bit if one machine gets a -bigadv work unit, and the second machine does not and folds a regular SMP work unit instead.
Right now both are working on 6900 project.Tim_H wrote:do you have any frame times on the same Project for both machines?
Code: Select all
[08:20:47] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
[08:20:47] Version 2.27 (Mar 12, 2010)
[08:20:47]
[08:20:47] Preparing to commence simulation
[08:20:47] - Looking at optimizations...
[08:20:47] - Created dyn
[08:20:47] - Files status OK
[08:20:54] - Expanded 24875224 -> 30796292 (decompressed 123.8 percent)
[08:20:54] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=24875224 data_size=30796292, decompressed_data_size=30796292 diff=0
[08:20:54] - Digital signature verified
[08:20:54]
[08:20:54] Project: 6900 (Run 32, Clone 20, Gen 59)
[08:20:54]
[08:20:54] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[08:20:54] Entering M.D.
[08:21:00] Mapping NT from 16 to 16
[08:21:05] Completed 0 out of 250000 steps (0%)
[08:47:47] Completed 2500 out of 250000 steps (1%)
[09:14:25] Completed 5000 out of 250000 steps (2%)
[09:40:58] Completed 7500 out of 250000 steps (3%)
[10:07:45] Completed 10000 out of 250000 steps (4%)
[10:34:24] Completed 12500 out of 250000 steps (5%)Code: Select all
[10:02:14] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
[10:02:14] Version 2.27 (Mar 12, 2010)
[10:02:14]
[10:02:14] Preparing to commence simulation
[10:02:14] - Looking at optimizations...
[10:02:14] - Created dyn
[10:02:14] - Files status OK
[10:02:20] - Expanded 24872697 -> 30796292 (decompressed 123.8 percent)
[10:02:20] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=24872697 data_size=30796292, decompressed_data_size=30796292 diff=0
[10:02:20] - Digital signature verified
[10:02:20]
[10:02:20] Project: 6900 (Run 42, Clone 20, Gen 56)
[10:02:20]
[10:02:20] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[10:02:20] Entering M.D.
[10:02:27] Mapping NT from 16 to 16
[10:02:31] Completed 0 out of 250000 steps (0%)
[10:35:59] Completed 2500 out of 250000 steps (1%)
[11:09:25] Completed 5000 out of 250000 steps (2%)
[11:42:54] Completed 7500 out of 250000 steps (3%)Code: Select all
CPU Mark: 10382.6/11000
CPU Integer Math: 3878.7/4000
CPU Floating Point Math: 4490.9/5000
CPU Prime Numbers: 1374/2000
CPU SSE: 29.3/30
CPU Compression: 13335.7/14000
CPU Encryption: 42.6/50
CPU Physics: 708.6/800
CPU String Sorting: 7559.1/8000
Memory Mark: 2393.5/3000
Memory Small Block: 5071.9
Memory Read Cached: 2149.2/3000
Memory Read Uncached:2039.2/3000
Memory Write: 2257.1/3000
Memory Large RAM: 6707.2/7000
Disk Mark: 1377/2000
Disk Sequential Read: 140.1/200
Disk Sequential Write: 111/200
Disk Random Seek +RW: 129.7/200
Code: Select all
CPU Mark: 10308.8/11000
CPU Integer Math: 3837.2/4000
CPU Floating Point Math: 4477.6/5000
CPU Prime Numbers: 1358.9/2000
CPU SSE: 29.1/30
CPU Compression: 13353.4/14000
CPU Encryption: 42.3/50
CPU Physics: 682.8/700
CPU String Sorting: 7835/8000
Memory Mark: 2323.9/3000
Memory Small Block: 5086.3/6000
Memory Read Cached: 2152.1/3000
Memory Read Uncached:2037.8/3000
Memory Write: 2258.6/3000
Memory Large RAM: 6429.8/7000
Disk Mark: 1219.9/2000
Disk Sequential Read: 129.6/200
Disk Sequential Write: 104.7/200
Disk Random Seek +RW: 103/200
