Personally, I have been a F@H member of almost a year and never had any problems running my Uni-processor clients(Systray) and the GPU clients (Systray). I initially wanted to yous SMP client but after I read the install Wiki, the mention of CLI made me stick with Uni-Processor. I am very happy that the SMP2 client is released as the a3 core doesn't need any CLI interface. Once the a1 core retires, the SMP2 client will be re-released without any fussy installations so I am sure that the GUI interface will allow me to setup the clients very easily.
If one were to look back when F@H started, in 2000, it would be a handful of people who started this project and within a span of almost 10 years, a handful of contributors is now in a staggering 1.36 Million and is continuously growing. The advancements Dr, Vijay and his team made are well received in the scientific community. With around 70 published papers that are peer approved, that is an achievement in itself without a doubt in my mind.
dimilunatic wrote:In addition, spending $700 for a new processor -as many rush to suggest- isn't so much a possibility for everyone these days. *economic crisis hinthint*
I haven't really come across anyone who tells people to change there processors(maybe I am not reading enough threads to come across this suggestion
) rather, I have seen posts where they help the individual to identify the hardware problem that is causing and the last advice is to change that defective piece of hardware.
P5-133XL wrote: The first is that it has to be done by hand and the people that deal with budgets are not willing to pay for that feature. The second is that the ability to transfer points from one team to another will create competition, among teams, for specific people that are very high point producers to move the rank of the team. The ability to allow these people to move their points from one team to another produces totally invalidates team rankings if you can produce points for one team and them move them to a different team, on a whim Third, I do not believe that Stanford wishes to create an marketplace where specific individuals can extort their team to stay with them, collect something to move to another team, or for a team to bribe a person away from one team to their team.
I think that this should be included in the F@H FAQs about making teams as it is very simple and highlights a lot of important points. However I would like to suggest a feature; those people who start folding with the default team, be given a single chance to move their points from the default team to a team of their choice. That way there won't be any problems as the default team doesn't represent anyone except those people didn't join a particular team.
P5-133XL wrote:You are welcome to add a suggestion for future improvements to the code and I'm sure that Stanford will take you suggestion into consideration in developing future code. People that do write code, do frequent this place so it may be useful
The best part of F@H is its folding community. It is extremely dynamic where people can interact with the project leaders and staff from the Pande group itself. Regarding suggestions, I have already started a thread for GPU3 features (
http://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=13368) and hopefully, some of the features suggested by us will eventually make it into GPU3 if its not too late.
Wrish wrote:You can set the system to auto-restart on error and auto-launch FAH, but don't rely on this too often because the auto-launch sometimes fails.
Is this possible on Win7 32-bit? Also could the auto-launch be delayed by a fixed number of minutes so that the system warms up and is ready for folding?
In the end, I am a proud F@H member and I believe that the username chosen reflects a person's character thus I don't consider any nick to be "silly" there is always a depth to it.