Picked up a few of these recently and noticed PPD is quite low compared to other work units, even 13015. Appreciate that atom count is relatively low at 105k, so utilization on larger GPUs will be less, but notice this disparity even on a relatively slow RTX 4050. Some numbers for comparison:
RTX 5080:
Average across 1933 completed work units: 27,849,623
Average for 13014: 16,023,064
Average for 13015: 22,500,668 (lower than normal, but not as bad as 13014)
RTX 4050:
Average across 745 completed work units: 3,169,581
Average for 13014: 1,381,079
Haven't picked up any 13015 on this one yet.
Not a problem, just curious if there is some obvious explanation for this large discrepancy that I am missing.
PPD very low for 13014
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
-
muziqaz
- Posts: 2572
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:22 pm
- Hardware configuration: 9950x, 9950x3d, 7950x3d, 5950x, 5800x3d
7900xtx, RX9070, Radeon 7, 5700xt, 6900xt, RX550, Intel B580 - Location: London
- Contact:
Re: PPD very low for 13014
This has been sorted for 13014. Still waiting for the fix for 13015.
Sorry for the trouble.
These projects were not disabled for windows when released.
Sorry for the trouble.
These projects were not disabled for windows when released.
Re: PPD very low for 13014
Does this mean the issue is windows specific?
I didn't specify initially, but my RTX 5080 is a Windows 11 system, but the RTX 4050 is Ubuntu, so observed similar behavior across both windows/linux FWIW.
-
muziqaz
- Posts: 2572
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:22 pm
- Hardware configuration: 9950x, 9950x3d, 7950x3d, 5950x, 5800x3d
7900xtx, RX9070, Radeon 7, 5700xt, 6900xt, RX550, Intel B580 - Location: London
- Contact:
Re: PPD very low for 13014
Issue is that researcher did not stop you from receiving these projects on windows systems.
This should be now fixed for 13014, at least. Still waiting for confirmation on 13015
This should be now fixed for 13014, at least. Still waiting for confirmation on 13015
Re: PPD very low for 13014
Understood. Just wanted to clarify that I did observe the very low PPD on Linux as well, not only Windows.
So to clarify, is this "fixed" as in:
1) These work units (13014, 13015 pending) are no longer (incorrectly) assigned to Windows hosts?
2) The PPD discrepancy is resolved on Linux hosts?
3) Both?
So to clarify, is this "fixed" as in:
1) These work units (13014, 13015 pending) are no longer (incorrectly) assigned to Windows hosts?
2) The PPD discrepancy is resolved on Linux hosts?
3) Both?