Project: 16928 (Run 1, Clone 12, Gen 665)

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
vmzy
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:25 am

Project: 16928 (Run 1, Clone 12, Gen 665)

Post by vmzy »

I just got a WU Project: 16928 (Run 1, Clone 12, Gen 665) , Which only have 4.5 hours of Timeout.I can`t got QRB bonus.
Assigned: 2021-01-14T03:03:32Z
Timeout: 2021-01-14T07:30:03Z
Expiration: 2021-01-21T03:03:32Z
But in this topic viewtopic.php?f=24&t=36352 , says it has 2 days of Timeout.
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Project: 16928 (Run 1, Clone 12, Gen 665)

Post by bruce »

What is the ETA for that WU? Or, putting it another way, what is the (TPF * 100)

What GPU are you using? Please post your log (see below)

These are supposedly very short WUs.

Yes, the timeout is being adjusted and I have not seen a published account to explain it, though there may be one somewhere. If you do not return the results by the adjusted timeout, you'll get no bonus. :(
vmzy
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:25 am

Re: Project: 16928 (Run 1, Clone 12, Gen 665)

Post by vmzy »

My GPU is 03:46:43:FS01:Initialized folding slot 01: gpu:1:0 GP108 [GeForce MX150 (GT 1030) Max-Q] 1127
TPF is about 3:03
03:50:02:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 550000 out of 5000000 steps (11%)
03:53:05:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 600000 out of 5000000 steps (12%)

I think there must be something wrong with the WU`s timeout setting,it is too short for me.
I think the minimal Timeout should be one day, rather then several hours.
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: Project: 16928 (Run 1, Clone 12, Gen 665)

Post by PantherX »

Eek! I have asked around so let's see what happens :)
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
vmzy
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:25 am

Re: Project: 16928 (Run 1, Clone 12, Gen 665)

Post by vmzy »

I got 12,819 points for that WU,Maybe it just display error of FAHControl.
In fah log it says:

Code: Select all

08:25:47:WU01:FS01:Upload 66.77%
08:26:30:WU01:FS01:Upload complete
08:26:30:WU01:FS01:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
08:26:30:WU01:FS01:Final credit estimate, 12818.00 points
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: Project: 16928 (Run 1, Clone 12, Gen 665)

Post by PantherX »

FAHControl showed you less points than what you actually got :P
12,819.4 as per this: https://apps.foldingathome.org/wu#proje ... 12&gen=665

Considering that the base points were 2,647 and you got 12,819.4, I would say that you got Bonus points :) I am in discussions about this and hopefully, there will be some clarity about this very soon ;)
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Post Reply