low-end GPU comparison (AMD vs. Nvidia)

A forum for discussing FAH-related hardware choices and info on actual products (not speculation).

Moderator: Site Moderators

Forum rules
Please read the forum rules before posting.
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: low-end GPU comparison (AMD vs. Nvidia)

Post by bruce »

Turbonium wrote:
Turbonium wrote:Around 3x the GFLOPs, slightly higher TDP? :D
Regarding this:

So if i leave the video card BIOS as-is, it will not go over 40W TDP, even within a Linux environment (meaning roughly 300% the GFLOPs, at a cost of 133% TDP)?

I'm asking due to the discrepancy between Nvidia's advertised TDP for the card (60W), versus the actual TDP (~40W) as dictated by its BIOS.
The main focus of this forum is help with the FAH software provided by Stanford University. While an expert who happens to know enough details about the BIOS or the TDP or about what capabilities can be accessed on Linux may happen to notice your question and provide a good answer, this forum is not the best place to find the answers you're seeking. This question should be asked on a forum run by the GPU manufacturer or a hardware enthusiast forum.
Dan_G
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 5:48 am

Re: low-end GPU comparison (AMD vs. Nvidia)

Post by Dan_G »

I also have a 620, but only get 1250 ppd. I'm running v7, get core_17 jobs, and easily meet deadlines. Would I do better with v6? If so, why?
davidcoton
Posts: 1094
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:19 pm
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: low-end GPU comparison (AMD vs. Nvidia)

Post by davidcoton »

@DanG. Post your log, especially the initial sections showinfg your system and config.

Do you have a passkey?
Image
Dan_G
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 5:48 am

Re: low-end GPU comparison (AMD vs. Nvidia)

Post by Dan_G »

Unfortunately I've been playing around removing the "advanced" option I was running with and then trying different WUs by deleting the work folder a few times, so the log is pretty garbled.

Also, I don't actually "easily" meet deadlines -- on closer inspection, my GPU eta is only just under the Timeout.

Code: Select all


*********************** Log Started 2014-11-01T10:30:10Z ***********************
10:30:10:************************* Folding@home Client *************************
10:30:10:      Website: http://folding.stanford.edu/
10:30:10:    Copyright: (c) 2009-2014 Stanford University
10:30:10:       Author: Joseph Coffland <joseph@cauldrondevelopment.com>
10:30:10:         Args: --open-web-control
10:30:10:       Config: C:/ProgramData/FAHClient/config.xml
10:30:10:******************************** Build ********************************
10:30:10:      Version: 7.4.4
10:30:10:         Date: Mar 4 2014
10:30:10:         Time: 20:26:54
10:30:10:      SVN Rev: 4130
10:30:10:       Branch: fah/trunk/client
10:30:10:     Compiler: Intel(R) C++ MSVC 1500 mode 1200
10:30:10:      Options: /TP /nologo /EHa
/Qdiag-disable:4297,4103,1786,279 /Ox -arch:SSE
10:30:10:               /QaxSSE2,SSE3,SSSE3,SSE4.1,SSE4.2 /Qopenmp
/Qrestrict /MT /Qmkl
10:30:10:     Platform: win32 XP
10:30:10:         Bits: 32
10:30:10:         Mode: Release
10:30:10:******************************* System ********************************
10:30:10:          CPU: AMD A4-5000 APU with Radeon(TM) HD Graphics
10:30:10:       CPU ID: AuthenticAMD Family 22 Model 0 Stepping 1
10:30:10:         CPUs: 4
10:30:10:       Memory: 5.94GiB
10:30:10:  Free Memory: 4.78GiB
10:30:10:      Threads: WINDOWS_THREADS
10:30:10:   OS Version: 6.2
10:30:10:  Has Battery: false
10:30:10:   On Battery: false
10:30:10:   UTC Offset: 0
10:30:10:          PID: 4732
10:30:10:          CWD: C:/ProgramData/FAHClient
10:30:10:           OS: Windows 8.1
10:30:10:      OS Arch: AMD64
10:30:10:         GPUs: 1
10:30:10:        GPU 0: NVIDIA:2 GF119 [GeForce GT 620]
10:30:10:         CUDA: 2.1
10:30:10:  CUDA Driver: 6050
10:30:10:Win32 Service: false
10:30:10:***********************************************************************
10:30:10:<config>
10:30:10:  <!-- Folding Core -->
10:30:10:  <checkpoint v='30'/>
10:30:10:
10:30:10:  <!-- Network -->
10:30:10:  <proxy v=':8080'/>
10:30:10:
10:30:10:  <!-- Slot Control -->
10:30:10:  <pause-on-battery v='false'/>
10:30:10:  <power v='FULL'/>
10:30:10:
10:30:10:  <!-- User Information -->
10:30:10:  <passkey v='********************************'/>
10:30:10:  <user v='Dan_Grey'/>
10:30:10:
10:30:10:  <!-- Folding Slots -->
10:30:10:  <slot id='0' type='CPU'>
10:30:10:    <paused v='true'/>
10:30:10:  </slot>
10:30:10:  <slot id='1' type='GPU'>
10:30:10:    <client-type v='advanced'/>
10:30:10:    <paused v='true'/>
10:30:10:  </slot>
10:30:10:</config>
10:30:10:Trying to access database...
10:30:11:Successfully acquired database lock
10:30:11:Enabled folding slot 00: PAUSED cpu:3 (by user)
10:30:11:Enabled folding slot 01: PAUSED gpu:0:GF119 [GeForce GT 620] (by user)
10:30:11:Set client configured
10:30:21:15:127.0.0.1:New Web connection
10:30:40:FS00:Unpaused
10:30:40:FS01:Unpaused
10:30:40:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171.67.108.200:8080
10:30:40:WU01:FS01:Connecting to 171.67.108.200:8080
10:30:41:WU01:FS01:Connecting to 171.67.108.200:80
10:30:41:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171.67.108.200:8080
10:30:42:WU00:FS00:Assigned to work server 171.64.65.99
10:30:42:WU00:FS00:Requesting new work unit for slot 00: READY cpu:3
from 171.64.65.99
10:30:42:WU01:FS01:Assigned to work server 140.163.4.231
10:30:42:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.99:8080
10:30:42:WU01:FS01:Requesting new work unit for slot 01: READY
gpu:0:GF119 [GeForce GT 620] from 140.163.4.231
10:30:42:WU01:FS01:Connecting to 140.163.4.231:8080
10:30:42:WU01:FS01:Downloading 4.83MiB
10:30:43:WU00:FS00:Downloading 1.96MiB
10:30:46:WU01:FS01:Download complete
10:30:46:WU01:FS01:Received Unit: id:01 state:DOWNLOAD error:NO_ERROR
project:13000 run:165 clone:0 gen:66 core:0x17
unit:0x00000071538b3db7530fca8f5234fa7d
10:30:47:WU01:FS01:Starting
10:30:47:WU01:FS01:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files
(x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe"
C:/ProgramData/FAHClient/cores/web.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/AMD64/NVIDIA/Fermi/Core_17.fah/FahCore_17.exe
-dir 01 -suffix 01 -version 704 -lifeline 4732 -checkpoint 30 -gpu 0
-gpu-vendor nvidia
10:30:47:WU01:FS01:Started FahCore on PID 4476
10:30:47:WU01:FS01:Core PID:5188
10:30:47:WU01:FS01:FahCore 0x17 started
10:30:47:WU01:FS01:0x17:*********************** Log Started
2014-11-01T10:30:47Z ***********************
10:30:47:WU01:FS01:0x17:Project: 13000 (Run 165, Clone 0, Gen 66)
10:30:47:WU01:FS01:0x17:Unit: 0x00000071538b3db7530fca8f5234fa7d
10:30:47:WU01:FS01:0x17:CPU: 0x00000000000000000000000000000000
10:30:47:WU01:FS01:0x17:Machine: 1
10:30:47:WU01:FS01:0x17:Reading tar file state.xml
10:30:48:WU00:FS00:Download complete
10:30:48:WU00:FS00:Received Unit: id:00 state:DOWNLOAD error:NO_ERROR
project:7808 run:1 clone:172 gen:108 core:0xa4
unit:0x000000830a3b1e874e30f1ed48412cf1
10:30:48:WU00:FS00:Starting
10:30:48:WU00:FS00:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files
(x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe"
C:/ProgramData/FAHClient/cores/web.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/AMD64/Core_a4.fah/FahCore_a4.exe
-dir 00 -suffix 01 -version 704 -lifeline 4732 -checkpoint 30 -np 3
10:30:48:WU00:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 4412
10:30:48:WU00:FS00:Core PID:3536
10:30:48:WU00:FS00:FahCore 0xa4 started
10:30:49:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
10:30:49:WU00:FS00:0xa4:*------------------------------*
10:30:49:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Folding@Home Gromacs GB Core
10:30:49:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010)
10:30:49:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
10:30:49:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Preparing to commence simulation
10:30:49:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Looking at optimizations...
10:30:49:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Created dyn
10:30:49:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Files status OK
10:30:49:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Expanded 2053725 -> 5365960 (decompressed
261.2 percent)
10:30:49:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Called DecompressByteArray:
compressed_data_size=2053725 data_size=5365960,
decompressed_data_size=5365960 diff=0
10:30:49:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Digital signature verified
10:30:49:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
10:30:49:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Project: 7808 (Run 1, Clone 172, Gen 108)
10:30:49:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
10:30:49:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Assembly optimizations on if available.
10:30:49:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Entering M.D.
10:30:51:WU01:FS01:0x17:Reading tar file system.xml
10:30:53:WU01:FS01:0x17:Reading tar file integrator.xml
10:30:53:WU01:FS01:0x17:Reading tar file core.xml
10:30:53:WU01:FS01:0x17:Digital signatures verified
10:30:53:WU01:FS01:0x17:Folding@home GPU core17
10:30:53:WU01:FS01:0x17:Version 0.0.52
10:30:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Mapping NT from 3 to 3
10:30:57:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 0 out of 1500000 steps  (0%)
10:31:12:Removing old file 'configs/config-20141004-125726.xml'
10:31:12:Saving configuration to config.xml
10:31:12:<config>
10:31:12:  <!-- Folding Core -->
10:31:12:  <checkpoint v='30'/>
10:31:12:
10:31:12:  <!-- Network -->
10:31:12:  <proxy v=':8080'/>
10:31:12:
10:31:12:  <!-- Slot Control -->
10:31:12:  <pause-on-battery v='false'/>
10:31:12:  <power v='FULL'/>
10:31:12:
10:31:12:  <!-- User Information -->
10:31:12:  <passkey v='********************************'/>
10:31:12:  <user v='Dan_Grey'/>
10:31:12:
10:31:12:  <!-- Folding Slots -->
10:31:12:  <slot id='0' type='CPU'/>
10:31:12:  <slot id='1' type='GPU'>
10:31:12:    <client-type v='advanced'/>
10:31:12:  </slot>
10:31:12:</config>
10:33:26:FS00:Paused
10:33:26:FS01:Paused
10:33:26:FS00:Shutting core down
10:33:26:FS01:Shutting core down
10:33:26:WU01:FS01:0x17:WARNING:Console control signal 1 on PID 5188
10:33:26:WU01:FS01:0x17:Exiting, please wait. . .
10:33:30:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Client no longer detected. Shutting down core
10:33:30:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
10:33:30:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Folding@home Core Shutdown: CLIENT_DIED
10:33:30:WU00:FS00:FahCore returned: INTERRUPTED (102 = 0x66)
10:34:05:FS00:Unpaused
10:34:05:FS01:Unpaused
10:34:05:WU00:FS00:Starting
10:34:05:WU00:FS00:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files
(x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe"
C:/ProgramData/FAHClient/cores/web.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/AMD64/Core_a4.fah/FahCore_a4.exe
-dir 00 -suffix 01 -version 704 -lifeline 4732 -checkpoint 30 -np 3
10:34:06:WU00:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 5512
10:34:06:WU00:FS00:Core PID:2208
10:34:06:WU00:FS00:FahCore 0xa4 started
10:34:06:WARNING:WU00:FS00:FahCore returned: MISSING_WORK_FILES (116 = 0x74)
10:34:06:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Fatal error, dumping
10:34:06:WU00:FS00:Sending unit results: id:00 state:SEND error:DUMPED
project:7808 run:1 clone:172 gen:108 core:0xa4
unit:0x000000830a3b1e874e30f1ed48412cf1
10:34:06:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Missing original Unit data, cannot send dump report
10:34:06:WU00:FS00:Cleaning up
10:34:07:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171.67.108.200:8080
10:34:08:WU00:FS00:Assigned to work server 128.252.203.2
10:34:08:WU00:FS00:Requesting new work unit for slot 00: READY cpu:3
from 128.252.203.2
10:34:08:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 128.252.203.2:8080
10:34:09:WU00:FS00:Downloading 1.17MiB
10:34:15:WU00:FS00:Download 64.26%
10:34:19:WU00:FS00:Download complete
10:34:19:WU00:FS00:Received Unit: id:00 state:DOWNLOAD error:NO_ERROR
project:10186 run:270 clone:1 gen:37 core:0xa4
unit:0x000000284c71bbb05418d463c7396717
10:34:19:WU00:FS00:Starting
10:34:19:WU00:FS00:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files
(x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe"
C:/ProgramData/FAHClient/cores/web.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/AMD64/Core_a4.fah/FahCore_a4.exe
-dir 00 -suffix 01 -version 704 -lifeline 4732 -checkpoint 30 -np 3
10:34:19:WU00:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 2444
10:34:19:WU00:FS00:Core PID:4472
10:34:19:WU00:FS00:FahCore 0xa4 started
10:34:19:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
10:34:19:WU00:FS00:0xa4:*------------------------------*
10:34:19:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Folding@Home Gromacs GB Core
10:34:19:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010)
10:34:19:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
10:34:19:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Preparing to commence simulation
10:34:19:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Looking at optimizations...
10:34:19:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Created dyn
10:34:19:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Files status OK
10:34:19:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Expanded 1223290 -> 2731536 (decompressed
223.2 percent)
10:34:19:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Called DecompressByteArray:
compressed_data_size=1223290 data_size=2731536,
decompressed_data_size=2731536 diff=0
10:34:20:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Digital signature verified
10:34:20:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
10:34:20:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Project: 10186 (Run 270, Clone 1, Gen 37)
10:34:20:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
10:34:20:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Assembly optimizations on if available.
10:34:20:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Entering M.D.
10:34:26:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Mapping NT from 3 to 3
10:34:26:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 0 out of 500000 steps  (0%)
10:34:39:FS00:Paused
10:34:39:FS01:Paused
10:34:39:FS00:Shutting core down
10:34:39:FS01:Shutting core down
10:34:49:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Client no longer detected. Shutting down core
10:34:49:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
10:34:49:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Folding@home Core Shutdown: CLIENT_DIED
10:34:50:WU00:FS00:FahCore returned: INTERRUPTED (102 = 0x66)
10:34:56:FS00:Unpaused
10:34:56:FS01:Unpaused
10:34:56:WU00:FS00:Starting
10:34:56:WU00:FS00:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files
(x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe"
C:/ProgramData/FAHClient/cores/web.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/AMD64/Core_a4.fah/FahCore_a4.exe
-dir 00 -suffix 01 -version 704 -lifeline 4732 -checkpoint 30 -np 3
10:34:56:WU00:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 4660
10:34:56:WU00:FS00:Core PID:2436
10:34:56:WU00:FS00:FahCore 0xa4 started
10:34:56:WARNING:WU00:FS00:FahCore returned: MISSING_WORK_FILES (116 = 0x74)
10:34:56:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Fatal error, dumping
10:34:56:WU00:FS00:Sending unit results: id:00 state:SEND error:DUMPED
project:10186 run:270 clone:1 gen:37 core:0xa4
unit:0x000000284c71bbb05418d463c7396717
10:34:56:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Missing original Unit data, cannot send dump report
10:34:56:WU00:FS00:Cleaning up
10:34:57:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171.67.108.200:8080
10:34:58:WU00:FS00:Assigned to work server 128.252.203.2
10:34:58:WU00:FS00:Requesting new work unit for slot 00: READY cpu:3
from 128.252.203.2
10:34:58:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 128.252.203.2:8080
10:34:59:WU00:FS00:Downloading 1.17MiB
10:35:05:WU00:FS00:Download 48.16%
10:35:10:WU00:FS00:Download complete
10:35:10:WU00:FS00:Received Unit: id:00 state:DOWNLOAD error:NO_ERROR
project:10186 run:932 clone:2 gen:34 core:0xa4
unit:0x000000234c71bbb05418d74d9d0c355a
10:35:10:WU00:FS00:Starting
10:35:10:WU00:FS00:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files
(x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe"
C:/ProgramData/FAHClient/cores/web.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/AMD64/Core_a4.fah/FahCore_a4.exe
-dir 00 -suffix 01 -version 704 -lifeline 4732 -checkpoint 30 -np 3
10:35:10:WU00:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 5372
10:35:10:WU00:FS00:Core PID:3748
10:35:10:WU00:FS00:FahCore 0xa4 started
10:35:11:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
10:35:11:WU00:FS00:0xa4:*------------------------------*
10:35:11:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Folding@Home Gromacs GB Core
10:35:11:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010)
10:35:11:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
10:35:11:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Preparing to commence simulation
10:35:11:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Looking at optimizations...
10:35:11:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Created dyn
10:35:11:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Files status OK
10:35:11:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Expanded 1224158 -> 2731536 (decompressed
223.1 percent)
10:35:11:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Called DecompressByteArray:
compressed_data_size=1224158 data_size=2731536,
decompressed_data_size=2731536 diff=0
10:35:11:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Digital signature verified
10:35:11:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
10:35:11:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Project: 10186 (Run 932, Clone 2, Gen 34)
10:35:11:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
10:35:11:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Assembly optimizations on if available.
10:35:11:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Entering M.D.
10:35:17:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Mapping NT from 3 to 3
10:35:18:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 0 out of 500000 steps  (0%)
10:41:16:WU01:FS01:0x17:Completed 0 out of 5000000 steps (0%)
10:41:16:WU01:FS01:0x17:Lost lifeline PID 4476, exiting
10:41:16:WU01:FS01:0x17:ERROR:103: Lost client lifeline
10:41:16:WU01:FS01:0x17:Folding@home Core Shutdown: CLIENT_DIED
10:41:16:WU01:FS01:FahCore returned: INTERRUPTED (102 = 0x66)
10:41:16:WU01:FS01:Starting
10:41:16:WU01:FS01:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files
(x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe"
C:/ProgramData/FAHClient/cores/web.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/AMD64/NVIDIA/Fermi/Core_17.fah/FahCore_17.exe
-dir 01 -suffix 01 -version 704 -lifeline 4732 -checkpoint 30 -gpu 0
-gpu-vendor nvidia
10:41:16:WU01:FS01:Started FahCore on PID 5172
10:41:16:WU01:FS01:Core PID:4024
10:41:16:WU01:FS01:FahCore 0x17 started
10:41:17:WU01:FS01:0x17:*********************** Log Started
2014-11-01T10:41:17Z ***********************
10:41:17:WU01:FS01:0x17:Project: 13000 (Run 165, Clone 0, Gen 66)
10:41:17:WU01:FS01:0x17:Unit: 0x00000071538b3db7530fca8f5234fa7d
10:41:17:WU01:FS01:0x17:CPU: 0x00000000000000000000000000000000
10:41:17:WU01:FS01:0x17:Machine: 1
10:41:17:WU01:FS01:0x17:Reading tar file state.xml
10:41:20:WU01:FS01:0x17:Reading tar file system.xml
10:41:22:WU01:FS01:0x17:Reading tar file integrator.xml
10:41:22:WU01:FS01:0x17:Reading tar file core.xml
10:41:22:WU01:FS01:0x17:Digital signatures verified
10:41:22:WU01:FS01:0x17:Folding@home GPU core17
10:41:22:WU01:FS01:0x17:Version 0.0.52
10:51:09:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps  (1%)
10:51:39:WU01:FS01:0x17:Completed 0 out of 5000000 steps (0%)
10:51:39:WU01:FS01:0x17:Temperature control disabled. Requirements:
single Nvidia GPU, tmax must be < 110 and twait >= 900
11:06:40:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 10000 out of 500000 steps  (2%)
davidcoton
Posts: 1094
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:19 pm
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: low-end GPU comparison (AMD vs. Nvidia)

Post by davidcoton »

OK there is a passkey in the config, so you will get some quick return bonus. But if you "only just" meet the deadline, the bonus for quick return will be small.

And of course if you keep deleting WUs, your may not qualify as your success rate will be under 80%. Please do not delete WUs unless you really need to.
Last edited by davidcoton on Sat Nov 01, 2014 6:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
artoar_11
Posts: 652
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 8:42 pm
Hardware configuration: AMD R7 3700X @ 4.0 GHz; ASUS ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING; DDR4 2x8GB @ 3.0 GHz; GByte RTX 3060 Ti @ 1890 MHz; Fortron-550W 80+ bronze; Win10 Pro/64
Location: Bulgaria/Team #224497/artoar11_ALL_....

Re: low-end GPU comparison (AMD vs. Nvidia)

Post by artoar_11 »

Probably your card is a GT 620 (Fermi microarchitecture), with 48 cuda cores. 620 is unable to fit in the deadline core_17. You get partial credit only (1250 ppd). I think you have two options:

1. Download the Client Version 6.41r2. There you will get WUs only from Core_15:
p7620-7627; Preferred (days) - 37.94; Credit - 14094
p8018; Preferred (days) - 13.77; Credit - 5757

2. I see that you have ​​a question for "second-generation Maxwells". I guess this is a better solution.
Dan_G
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 5:48 am

Re: low-end GPU comparison (AMD vs. Nvidia)

Post by Dan_G »

davidcoton wrote: And of course if you keep deleting WUs, your may not qualify as your success rate will be under 80%. Please do not delete WUs unless you really need to.
I forgot about the 80% rule; luckily I only deleted a few WUs out of the hundreds I've done.

I don't spend money on F@H, I'm just looking to get the most out of what is available to me. Think I'll just leave the 620 alone to get on with it -- it runs 24/7 and folds when active, so I'll just live with only squeaking in.
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: low-end GPU comparison (AMD vs. Nvidia)

Post by bruce »

artoar_11 wrote:Probably your card is a GT 620 (Fermi microarchitecture), with 48 cuda cores. 620 is unable to fit in the deadline core_17.
It should be noted that there are two types of GT 620's. One is a rebranded GT 520 (48 cores @ 1.6 GHz) and the other is a rebranded GT 530 (96 cores @ 1.4 GHz) so the ability to meet deadlines can easily vary by a factor of 1.7.
artoar_11
Posts: 652
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 8:42 pm
Hardware configuration: AMD R7 3700X @ 4.0 GHz; ASUS ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING; DDR4 2x8GB @ 3.0 GHz; GByte RTX 3060 Ti @ 1890 MHz; Fortron-550W 80+ bronze; Win10 Pro/64
Location: Bulgaria/Team #224497/artoar11_ALL_....

Re: low-end GPU comparison (AMD vs. Nvidia)

Post by artoar_11 »

bruce wrote:
artoar_11 wrote:Probably your card is a GT 620 (Fermi microarchitecture), with 48 cuda cores. 620 is unable to fit in the deadline core_17.
It should be noted that there are two types of GT 620's. One is a rebranded GT 520 (48 cores @ 1.6 GHz) and the other is a rebranded GT 530 (96 cores @ 1.4 GHz) so the ability to meet deadlines can easily vary by a factor of 1.7.
Yes bruce, you're right. But from Dan_G log:
10:30:10: GPU 0: NVIDIA:2 GF119 [GeForce GT 620]
According to Wikipedia:
GeForce GT 620 ....GF119....48 cuda cores
GeForce GT 620 .....GF108....96 cuda cores
Dan_G
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 5:48 am

Re: low-end GPU comparison (AMD vs. Nvidia)

Post by Dan_G »

artoar_11 wrote: Yes bruce, you're right. But from Dan_G log:
10:30:10: GPU 0: NVIDIA:2 GF119 [GeForce GT 620]
According to Wikipedia:
GeForce GT 620 ....GF119....48 cuda cores
GeForce GT 620 .....GF108....96 cuda cores
That explains the difference in performance between my (oem) 620 and the other...

Thanks for the information
Dan_G
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 5:48 am

Re: low-end GPU comparison (AMD vs. Nvidia)

Post by Dan_G »

My TPF on the 620 has increased to the point where it will miss the expiration deadline, so I've disabled it for the time being. No point wasting electricity if the work won't be used.

I suspect I haven't been paying close enough attention to this machine's GPU slot and its deadlines.
Dan_G
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 5:48 am

Re: low-end GPU comparison (AMD vs. Nvidia)

Post by Dan_G »

*Someone* -- I'm afraid I can't recall who -- suggested I go back to Nvidia 31x series drivers to improve the performance of my 620 card. Indeed, going back to 314 has greatly reduced my TPF and my eta is below Timeout once again.

Thank you, whoever it was!
Post Reply