Projects 762x Testing Core v2.25 on Adv

If you think it might be a driver problem, see viewforum.php?f=79

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
tjlane
Pande Group Member
Posts: 161
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:19 pm
Location: Stanford, CA

Projects 762x Testing Core v2.25 on Adv

Post by tjlane »

Folding Forum,

Please be aware that we are rolling out a new version of GPU Core15, v2.25. This core includes support for the new generation of nVidia boards, the Kepler series.

While this core has been extensively beta-tested and not shown issues, we are doing a controlled release to the general FAH community. Over the next few days, the p762x series will run on advmethods and require core15 v2.25. Your client should upgrade automatically to the new core.

Please let us know by posting here what your experience with the new core is -- if all goes well, we will release to the entire FAH community shortly, so we can support Kepler boards.

Thanks!

TJ
7im
Posts: 10179
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: Projects 762x Testing Core v2.25 on Adv

Post by 7im »

Supported does not equal optimized.

Any comments in regards to speed? Or further optimizations possible?
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
k1wi
Posts: 909
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:48 pm

Re: Projects 762x Testing Core v2.25 on Adv

Post by k1wi »

I haven't noticed any increase in performance from v2.25 on my 500 series GPU, are you referring to Kepler 7im?
7im
Posts: 10179
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: Projects 762x Testing Core v2.25 on Adv

Post by 7im »

k1wi wrote:I haven't noticed any increase in performance from v2.25 on my 500 series GPU, are you referring to Kepler 7im?
Yes.
tjlane wrote:... This core includes support for the new generation of nVidia boards, the Kepler series.
Also concerned that v2.25 caused slightly longer frame times on a few projects using Fermi boards.
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
Zagen30
Posts: 823
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:45 am
Hardware configuration: Core i7 3770K @3.5 GHz (not folding), 8 GB DDR3 @2133 MHz, 2xGTX 780 @1215 MHz, Windows 7 Pro 64-bit running 7.3.6 w/ 1xSMP, 2xGPU

4P E5-4650 @3.1 GHz, 64 GB DDR3 @1333MHz, Ubuntu Desktop 13.10 64-bit

Re: Projects 762x Testing Core v2.25 on Adv

Post by Zagen30 »

The core was updated without issue. I'm currently running 7626 (Run 103, Clone 0, Gen 83) on one GTX 460 and 7624 (Run 111, Clone 0, Gen 88) on the other. HFM reports ~9:13 TPF resulting in ~8k PPD for both. My previous history (a few hundred WUs according to HFM) with 762x was that they ran at about 6:50 TPF for ~11k PPD.
Last edited by Zagen30 on Fri Oct 26, 2012 12:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Grandpa_01
Posts: 1122
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:36 am
Hardware configuration: 3 - Supermicro H8QGi-F AMD MC 6174=144 cores 2.5Ghz, 96GB G.Skill DDR3 1333Mhz Ubuntu 10.10
2 - Asus P6X58D-E i7 980X 4.4Ghz 6GB DDR3 2000 A-Data 64GB SSD Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus Rampage Gene III 17 970 4.3Ghz DDR3 2000 2-500GB Segate 7200.11 0-Raid Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus G73JH Laptop i7 740QM 1.86Ghz ATI 5870M

Re: Projects 762x Testing Core v2.25 on Adv

Post by Grandpa_01 »

7im wrote:
k1wi wrote:I haven't noticed any increase in performance from v2.25 on my 500 series GPU, are you referring to Kepler 7im?
Yes.
tjlane wrote:... This core includes support for the new generation of nVidia boards, the Kepler series.
Also concerned that v2.25 caused slightly longer frame times on a few projects using Fermi boards.
Actually the core causes much longer frame times on some projects, On my GTX 580 Project 8018 core 2.22 = 2:51 core 2.25 = 4:59 :wink: Hopefully this will not cause ther rest of the folding comnity problems just to support Kepler. :wink:
Image
2 - SM H8QGi-F AMD 6xxx=112 cores @ 3.2 & 3.9Ghz
5 - SM X9QRI-f+ Intel 4650 = 320 cores @ 3.15Ghz
2 - I7 980X 4.4Ghz 2-GTX680
1 - 2700k 4.4Ghz GTX680
Total = 464 cores folding
k1wi
Posts: 909
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:48 pm

Re: Projects 762x Testing Core v2.25 on Adv

Post by k1wi »

Zagen30 wrote:The core was updated without issue. I'm currently running 7626 (Run 103, Clone 0, Gen 83) on one GTX 460 and 7624 (Run 111, Clone 0, Gen 88) on the other. HFM reports ~9:13 TPF resulting in ~8k PPD for both. My previous history (822 WUs according to HFM) with 762x was that they ran at about 6:50 TPF for ~11k PPD.
Ah damnit - now that I've taken a closer look I get the same drop as grandpa on project 8018 on my 570. There goes my blissful unawaredness!

The lower PPD is similar to the PPD I got with 2.22 on the 76xx projects, so I wonder if that means their ppd is even lower again with 2.25 or whether there is some sort of interaction going on.
Grandpa_01
Posts: 1122
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:36 am
Hardware configuration: 3 - Supermicro H8QGi-F AMD MC 6174=144 cores 2.5Ghz, 96GB G.Skill DDR3 1333Mhz Ubuntu 10.10
2 - Asus P6X58D-E i7 980X 4.4Ghz 6GB DDR3 2000 A-Data 64GB SSD Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus Rampage Gene III 17 970 4.3Ghz DDR3 2000 2-500GB Segate 7200.11 0-Raid Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus G73JH Laptop i7 740QM 1.86Ghz ATI 5870M

Re: Projects 762x Testing Core v2.25 on Adv

Post by Grandpa_01 »

yes the 762x series will have the same reduced tpf as the 8018's and all the other WU's with 2.25 :(
Image
2 - SM H8QGi-F AMD 6xxx=112 cores @ 3.2 & 3.9Ghz
5 - SM X9QRI-f+ Intel 4650 = 320 cores @ 3.15Ghz
2 - I7 980X 4.4Ghz 2-GTX680
1 - 2700k 4.4Ghz GTX680
Total = 464 cores folding
rhavern
Posts: 425
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 8:45 am
Location: UK

Re: Projects 762x Testing Core v2.25 on Adv

Post by rhavern »

I concur with the increased TPF, checked HFM, on the same hardware GTX460 OC to 1600 shaders, P8018 2.22 is 5:31 whereas 2.25 is 7:11. That is non-trivial.
Folding since 1 WU=1 point
ImageImage
BigApplePi
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 2:06 am

Re: Projects 762x Testing Core v2.25 on Adv

Post by BigApplePi »

Pardon me but I'm just a novice with this. I had been running a 680, model 02G-P4-2682 successfully for a few months now. Suddenly at the time of your current announcement, the gpu project given 7623 doesn't work. It says it's running but progress stays at zero. A cold reboot of the computer doesn't help. No automatic start. Advise please. I removed the gpu WU but don't know how to add it back again.

Upgraded version 7 to 7.2.9, found the instructions for removing and adding slot. Got new WU and am okay now.
Last edited by BigApplePi on Sun Oct 28, 2012 11:54 am, edited 7 times in total.
Napoleon
Posts: 887
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 2:31 pm
Hardware configuration: Atom330 (overclocked):
Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Intel Atom330 dualcore (4 HyperThreads)
NVidia GT430, core_15 work
2x2GB Kingston KVR1333D3N9K2/4G 1333MHz memory kit
Asus AT3IONT-I Deluxe motherboard
Location: Finland

Re: Projects 762x Testing Core v2.25 on Adv

Post by Napoleon »

This is the exact same core v2.25 which was discussed in beta forum: viewtopic.php?f=66&t=21571, right? The tpf increase was also noted there. Furthermore, there's this statement by friedrim in viewtopic.php?f=66&t=22197&p=221635#p221635:
friedrim wrote:In the past there were two Cuda Cores based on OpenMM: Core_15 and Core_16. The Core_15 had an optimization that is no longer being applied, and Core_15 projects are being phased out. The optimization associated w/ the Cuda Core_15 was never implemented on the OpenCL platform so there has only been a Core_16 for OpenCL.
With core v2.22 my GT430 gets about 3500 PPD for P762x WUs. With core v2.25 it only gets about 2500 PPD. So yes, looks like some optimization was dropped from v2.25. P762x WUs + core v2.25 is a tough combination for my GT430. P762x WUs themselves produce about 1000 PPD less compared to other projects, and the new core shaves off yet another 1000 PPD. At the moment I'm in the middle of a P8018 WU / core v2.22, with an estimated 4800 PPD. :?

Core_15 v2.25 is the new FAH core for Fermi & Kepler GPUs. This is actually a bit confusing, at least to me. "Core_15 projects are being phased out" :?:
Last edited by Napoleon on Wed Nov 07, 2012 10:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Win7 64bit, FAH v7, OC'd
2C/4T Atom330 3x667MHz - GT430 2x832.5MHz - ION iGPU 3x466.7MHz
NaCl - Core_15 - display
Napoleon
Posts: 887
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 2:31 pm
Hardware configuration: Atom330 (overclocked):
Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Intel Atom330 dualcore (4 HyperThreads)
NVidia GT430, core_15 work
2x2GB Kingston KVR1333D3N9K2/4G 1333MHz memory kit
Asus AT3IONT-I Deluxe motherboard
Location: Finland

Re: Projects 762x Testing Core v2.25 on Adv

Post by Napoleon »

7im wrote:Any comments in regards to speed? Or further optimizations possible?
I noticed that the new 310.33 beta driver (released Oct 23, 2012) supports the CUDA 5 Toolkit (released Oct 15, 2012). I feel quite awkward, yammering about CUDA 5 in this very thread, but if I've understood e.g this article correctly, speedups will come when some FahCore after v2.25 adopts CUDA 5. :|
Developer Accolades for CUDA 5
Developers who evaluated the pre-release version of CUDA 5 have reported often dramatic application acceleration and improved programmability.
Win7 64bit, FAH v7, OC'd
2C/4T Atom330 3x667MHz - GT430 2x832.5MHz - ION iGPU 3x466.7MHz
NaCl - Core_15 - display
7im
Posts: 10179
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: Projects 762x Testing Core v2.25 on Adv

Post by 7im »

That's what people have been trying to say all along. PG is waiting on OTHER developments to optimize NV and ATI speeds.
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
Napoleon
Posts: 887
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 2:31 pm
Hardware configuration: Atom330 (overclocked):
Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Intel Atom330 dualcore (4 HyperThreads)
NVidia GT430, core_15 work
2x2GB Kingston KVR1333D3N9K2/4G 1333MHz memory kit
Asus AT3IONT-I Deluxe motherboard
Location: Finland

Re: Projects 762x Testing Core v2.25 on Adv

Post by Napoleon »

Indeed. Which is why I pointed out - more or less subtly - that first CUDA 5 capable driver was released only a couple of days ago, and a beta driver at that. Not to mention that the core also needs to be adapted to make most of the new CUDA features. :wink:
Win7 64bit, FAH v7, OC'd
2C/4T Atom330 3x667MHz - GT430 2x832.5MHz - ION iGPU 3x466.7MHz
NaCl - Core_15 - display
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Projects 762x Testing Core v2.25 on Adv

Post by bruce »

FAH Development may or may not be running internal tests with a beta version of the drivers but they DO NOT recommend that Donors use beta versions. (It's possible that beta drivers might create invalid results which might then contaminate the store of valid scientific data.) Certainly Development is not going to distribute a FahCore (even to beta testing) unless it works with drivers that have been formally released by Nvidia/AMD.
Post Reply