Great product, harlam.harlam357 wrote: To answer your question PantherX... yes, I'm doing my own PPD/Credit calcs and will continue to do so even after the FahClient gets its calc methods adjusted. At that level in HFM it doesn't care (or know) whether it's working with a v6 or v7 client. Have frame times, will calc.
One thing I really like about the existing HFM.net is that you can toggle different styles. There are several ways of looking at TPF and ETA - last frame, last three frames, all frames, effective rate. I know for me, there are times when I want to see different ones. If the system has been chugging along with no interruptions, no reboots, etc. it doesn't really matter which one. But, if there have been interruptions, I prefer the shorter averages, or even the last frame as a better predictor of where things are going.
I'm also very appreciative of the time display toggle - download time and ETA between wall-clock time and durations. Sometimes, I really like to see that it's been 3 hours since download and 2 hours ETA, and other times I like to see the actual time estimates. Thanks for the choice.
Are you going to be storing WU History computed elements like ppd and bonus credit in your sql database? I frequently pull up the database in SQlite browser or similar the data to export to EXCEL for further massaging. Currently, I've had to set up the spreadsheet to compute the bonus credit.
Again, thanks.
GW
should send me a cookie. 
Ah... you mean like this? 
but yes, I've integrated the templates into my monitoring site format enough that being able to monitor the data remotely from a browser is a big hook.