Project: 7600 (Run 19, Clone 0, Gen 13)

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
dgermann
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 4:35 pm
Location: Twin Cities, MN

Project: 7600 (Run 19, Clone 0, Gen 13)

Post by dgermann »

One core of one of my CPUs (Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E4500 @ 2.20GHz) got this WU on 9/9. According to unitinfo.txt, its final deadline is 10/3. But its progress is very slow -- about 18 hours per 1% step. At this rate, it'll be done by mid November or so.

Is this just a really slow WU with this CPU or is there a problem with this WU? I've seen 4-hour per 1% step WUs before, but nothing like this.

Thanks,
-Dan

Code: Select all

[23:14:30] - Preparing to get new work unit...
[23:14:30] + Attempting to get work packet
[23:14:30] - Connecting to assignment server
[23:14:31] - Successful: assigned to (171.64.65.101).
[23:14:31] + News From Folding@Home: Welcome to Folding@Home
[23:14:31] Loaded queue successfully.
[23:14:32] + Closed connections
[23:14:32]
[23:14:32] + Processing work unit
[23:14:32] Core required: FahCore_a4.exe
[23:14:32] Core found.
[23:14:32] Working on Unit 05 [September 9 23:14:32]
[23:14:32] + Working ...
[23:14:32]
[23:14:32] *------------------------------*
[23:14:32] Folding@Home Gromacs GB Core
[23:14:32] Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010)
[23:14:32]
[23:14:32] Preparing to commence simulation
[23:14:32] - Looking at optimizations...
[23:14:32] - Created dyn
[23:14:32] - Files status OK
[23:14:32] - Expanded 21577 -> 505776 (decompressed 2344.0 percent)
[23:14:32] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=21577 data_size=505776, decompressed_data_size=505776 diff=0
[23:14:32] - Digital signature verified
[23:14:32]
[23:14:32] Project: 7600 (Run 19, Clone 0, Gen 13)
[23:14:32]
[23:14:32] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[23:14:32] Entering M.D.
[23:14:38] Mapping NT from 1 to 1
[23:14:51] Completed 0 out of 2000000 steps  (0%)
[17:27:37] Completed 20000 out of 2000000 steps  (1%)
[13:14:45] Completed 40000 out of 2000000 steps  (2%)
[07:27:26] Completed 60000 out of 2000000 steps  (3%)
[01:37:56] Completed 80000 out of 2000000 steps  (4%)
Napoleon
Posts: 887
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 2:31 pm
Hardware configuration: Atom330 (overclocked):
Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Intel Atom330 dualcore (4 HyperThreads)
NVidia GT430, core_15 work
2x2GB Kingston KVR1333D3N9K2/4G 1333MHz memory kit
Asus AT3IONT-I Deluxe motherboard
Location: Finland

Re: Project: 7600 (Run 19, Clone 0, Gen 13)

Post by Napoleon »

I assume there's little else running on that system/core? I have very little experience about A4 core, but I'd like to suggest you restart the client with -verbosity 9 and -forceasm flags to get a detailed log. A4 core is highly likely to have the SSE optimization hardcoded into it, but I for one still add the -forceasm flag to my configurations out of habit. If a WU happens to run on traditional FPU instead of SSE optimization for some reason, it will run a lot slower.
Win7 64bit, FAH v7, OC'd
2C/4T Atom330 3x667MHz - GT430 2x832.5MHz - ION iGPU 3x466.7MHz
NaCl - Core_15 - display
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 7937
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2
Location: W. MA

Re: Project: 7600 (Run 19, Clone 0, Gen 13)

Post by Joe_H »

Project 7600 is one of the larger core A4 units, and probably should not have been assigned to a machine of your class. What flags do you have set? The A4 core can run both single-threaded as it is doing so on your system, or in SMP which would be with two cores. You may be able to switch to processing this using SMP and both cores, but the unit may fail. You would have to shutdown the second run of Folding while doing this.
Image

iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Project: 7600 (Run 19, Clone 0, Gen 13)

Post by bruce »

Napoleon's question about what else is running on that machine is a good one. What percent CPU does TaskManager say is being used by FahCore_a4? Does the machine fold 24x7?

The deadlines for p7600 are 13.92 days and 23.20 days. That means you'll have to average better than 3h20m to earn any bonus and better than 5h34m to get credit.
Grandpa_01
Posts: 1122
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:36 am
Hardware configuration: 3 - Supermicro H8QGi-F AMD MC 6174=144 cores 2.5Ghz, 96GB G.Skill DDR3 1333Mhz Ubuntu 10.10
2 - Asus P6X58D-E i7 980X 4.4Ghz 6GB DDR3 2000 A-Data 64GB SSD Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus Rampage Gene III 17 970 4.3Ghz DDR3 2000 2-500GB Segate 7200.11 0-Raid Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus G73JH Laptop i7 740QM 1.86Ghz ATI 5870M

Re: Project: 7600 (Run 19, Clone 0, Gen 13)

Post by Grandpa_01 »

I have never got one of these on my classic rig so I really do not have anything to compare it with. But I have run many of them on my -smp rigs and they are one of the fastest WU's out there when it comes to multithread machines. I get frame times of 00:01:20 compared to most other multithreaded WU's which generally have 2+ min frame times. so there is most likley something running in the background. Like maybe an AV doing a scan.
Image
2 - SM H8QGi-F AMD 6xxx=112 cores @ 3.2 & 3.9Ghz
5 - SM X9QRI-f+ Intel 4650 = 320 cores @ 3.15Ghz
2 - I7 980X 4.4Ghz 2-GTX680
1 - 2700k 4.4Ghz GTX680
Total = 464 cores folding
artoar_11
Posts: 652
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 8:42 pm
Hardware configuration: AMD R7 3700X @ 4.0 GHz; ASUS ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING; DDR4 2x8GB @ 3.0 GHz; GByte RTX 3060 Ti @ 1890 MHz; Fortron-550W 80+ bronze; Win10 Pro/64
Location: Bulgaria/Team #224497/artoar11_ALL_....

Re: Project: 7600 (Run 19, Clone 0, Gen 13)

Post by artoar_11 »

Do you use the latest version of the client - FAH6.34-win32-SMP.exe?
bollix47
Posts: 2958
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:04 am
Location: Canada

Re: Project: 7600 (Run 19, Clone 0, Gen 13)

Post by bollix47 »

I have had at least one P7600 on an i7@2.66 using a single core cpu client:

Avg. Time / Frame : 00:42:28 - 772 PPD

A tpf of 18 hours does seem a bit high. :e?:
Post Reply