Search found 10 matches
- Wed Oct 22, 2008 10:35 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: feature request: optional EUE verification by the client
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1099
Re: feature request: optional EUE verification by the client
This made me think if EUEs are handled automatically now is it implied that in these cases the hardware is not at fault ?or Perhaps the possibility is estimated in. When done manually imo it was a good way to test hardware "in practice/in the field" + contribute to the project (as opposed ...
- Tue Oct 21, 2008 1:42 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 650, Gen 55) 'EUE' ?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 553
Re: Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 650, Gen 55) 'EUE' ?
Thanks for the info ( + reminder as was going to DL v6.23 yesterday but forgot with current circumstances)...will do.
- Sun Oct 19, 2008 10:41 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2665 (Run 3, Clone 446, Gen 42)
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2521
Re: Project: 2665 (Run 3, Clone 446, Gen 42)
Not sure if following (as i understand it) any use for your Qfix probs; 1) You might need the latest version (of Qfix) to work with V6 clients - see half way down following linked page; http://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=191&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=60 2)The very least Qfix ...
- Sun Oct 19, 2008 8:42 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 650, Gen 55) 'EUE' ?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 553
Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 650, Gen 55) 'EUE' ?
Failed at the same point on both my sister machines (well same % progress anyway the slightly higher spec one (in my signature) got through a few kbs more of the WU looking at the logs. Have just Qfixed the result; LOWER spec Machine; [03:42:30] + Processing work unit [03:42:30] Work type a1 not eli...
- Fri Sep 26, 2008 6:38 am
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Team user using profane ID name
- Replies: 33
- Views: 6321
Fah MASS EXODUS
P5-133XL, you have a valid point. If people viewing your team stats come across an offending/obscene name, they would have thoughts about your team and possibly this entire F@H effort. A puzzling question then. How many people have been turned of to F@H for the cause due to offending/obscene names ...
- Fri Sep 26, 2008 6:28 am
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Team user using profane ID name
- Replies: 33
- Views: 6321
Irritating Minority quirk - tolerance goes BOTH ways
So, if the user actually had an ID of ButtSex it would still be legit? Now that is so strange. There are plenty of youths who are under the age of 13 that are folding for several of the teams out there. These minors will be reading other members IDs who are folding with them. It would be strange th...
- Tue Sep 23, 2008 1:06 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2665 (Run 3, Clone 325, Gen 45) ERROR 0x7b
- Replies: 1
- Views: 475
Project: 2665 (Run 3, Clone 325, Gen 45) ERROR 0x7b
I've looked but i couldn't see it listed by anyone else so i'll have to find out from you if i need to do more testing/checking for problems at "my end" or not ; Since it did a VERY EUE (just over 1%) on my main machine it was more convenient than usual to test it out on basically the same...
- Tue Jan 01, 2008 10:15 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2652 (Run 0 Clone 236 Gen 23) Again
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3144
Re: Project: 2652 (Run 0 Clone 236 Gen 23) Again
Well i've just had Project: 2652 *but* Run 0, Clone 430, Gen 44 and my system is all stock and likely very stable wrt win smp client since i've never have any issues like this before( i can remember) since i started folding last summer (i occasionally get hanging clients assoc. the net connection (i...
- Tue Jan 01, 2008 10:01 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project 2652 (Run 0, Clone 430, Gen 44)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1588
It's not clear from your post what Project/Run/Clone/Gen was involved with the long 1-4 interactions error you had at 57 percent. Was it Project: 3062 (Run 3, Clone 26, Gen 1) or perhaps Project: 2652 (Run 0, Clone 430, Gen 44) ? As a general rule, we don't encourage restarting from a backup becaus...
- Tue Jan 01, 2008 4:09 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project 2652 (Run 0, Clone 430, Gen 44)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1588
Project 2652 (Run 0, Clone 430, Gen 44)
Edit by -b: Split this topic off from one associated with a different project. (See 2nd post below.) I've just had the same issue and i thought posting my FAHlog (pasted from Fahmon - great tool imo) could potentially be of use to others/project overall ?(despite how small a possible contribution,i...