Search found 116 matches
- Mon Jan 07, 2013 6:58 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: GPU not being assigned WU, no appropriate WS available
- Replies: 42
- Views: 10689
Re: GTX 460 not being assigned WU, no appropriate WS availab
After doing some searching on the issue, I found a post on another forum that solved a similar problem by deleting queue.dat. I tried deleting the work directory, queue.dat, and unitinfo.txt, and now it's back up and running again. Weird.
- Mon Jan 07, 2013 6:02 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: GPU not being assigned WU, no appropriate WS available
- Replies: 42
- Views: 10689
Re: GTX 460 not being assigned WU, no appropriate WS availab
I'm going to pull my GTX 460 from the Linux rig and run it in a Windows system with both V6.41 and V7.2.9 tomorrow and will report back. If it fails to pull a WU with V6.41 but works with V7.2.9, then I think we can confirm the problem is limited to Fermi/Kepler on V6.41. In the meantime, I'll let i...
- Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:18 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: GPU not being assigned WU, no appropriate WS available
- Replies: 42
- Views: 10689
Re: GTX 460 not being assigned WU, no appropriate WS availab
FYI, I have a 9600 GSO running V6.41 with Wine on another Linux rig, and it's had no problems with assignments.
For me, it appears the problem may be Fermi/Kepler cards with V6 clients. My G80 card is working normally with V6.
For me, it appears the problem may be Fermi/Kepler cards with V6 clients. My G80 card is working normally with V6.
- Mon Jan 07, 2013 1:42 am
- Forum: New Donors start here
- Topic: GPU3 download link
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2742
Re: GPU3 download link
NeoenY152 is right -- the "High Performance Windows Clients Page" link on the "Older Versions" page (http://folding.stanford.edu/English/Download2011) is the only way to download the v6.41 GPU3 client, and the v6.41 links are returning an "Access forbidden" page.
- Mon Jan 07, 2013 1:27 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: GPU not being assigned WU, no appropriate WS available
- Replies: 42
- Views: 10689
Re: GTX 460 not being assigned WU, no appropriate WS availab
I'm hitting a very similar problem with my GTX 460 all day today. I just restarted it and got the same "No appropriate work server" problem. I'm running V6 with Wine, so V7 is not an option. Here's the log: --- Opening Log file [January 7 01:21:40 UTC] # Windows GPU Console Edition #######...
- Mon Jan 07, 2013 1:17 am
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Any solid reasons for running v6?
- Replies: 46
- Views: 13853
Re: Any solid reasons for running v6?
Until Ticket 584 is resolved (which ain't gonna happen anytime soon, it seems), V7 doesn't run at all under FreeBSD with built-in Linux emulation.
I couldn't get V7 to work with Wine for SMP folding either, so all my FreeBSD servers run V6.
I couldn't get V7 to work with Wine for SMP folding either, so all my FreeBSD servers run V6.
- Tue Dec 11, 2012 11:59 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 7623 (Run 179, Clone 1, Gen 13)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 627
Project: 7623 (Run 179, Clone 1, Gen 13)
Just got a new GTX 560 Ti 448, and this is the first WU that failed on it: [22:48:21] + Processing work unit [22:48:21] Core required: FahCore_15.exe [22:48:21] Core found. [22:48:21] Working on queue slot 02 [December 11 22:48:21 UTC] [22:48:21] + Working ... [22:48:21] - Calling '.\FahCore_15.exe ...
- Sun Nov 04, 2012 7:40 pm
- Forum: New Donors start here
- Topic: Multi OS folding
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1112
Re: Multi OS folding
Even under Wine I think you are going to have serious problems with bonus points. The two installs are going to be considered different by the work/collection servers and if a WU is returned by an install that did not get it originally you will not get bonus points. I do not know but I suspect that...
- Sun Nov 04, 2012 4:02 am
- Forum: New Donors start here
- Topic: Multi OS folding
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1112
Re: Multi OS folding
Hi is wish to set folding up so that I have a windows partitions and a linux one, and they both work on the same WU so if I switch OS's it picks up where the other left off. Basically can I have FAH run from the same directory in multiple OS's so that I can switch OS's and continue folding? You'll ...
- Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:49 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.67.108.21 in REJECT
- Replies: 2
- Views: 787
171.67.108.21 in REJECT
[03:40:37] + Attempting to get work packet [03:40:37] Passkey found [03:40:37] - Will indicate memory of 2007 MB [03:40:37] Gpu type=2 species=11. [03:40:37] - Connecting to assignment server [03:40:37] Connecting to http://assign-GPU.stanford.edu:8080/ [03:40:37] Posted data. [03:40:37] Initial: 4...
- Wed Apr 04, 2012 4:23 pm
- Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
- Topic: 7640 & 7643
- Replies: 22
- Views: 10203
Re: 7640 & 7643
As a comparison point, my stock GTX 460 (non-SE) has a 12:26 TPF for p7643. It takes almost 21 hours to complete one.
- Thu Mar 22, 2012 6:03 pm
- Forum: 3rd party contributed software
- Topic: HFM.NET - Monitoring Application for Folding@Home v7
- Replies: 768
- Views: 820070
Re: HFM.NET - Monitoring Application for Folding@Home v6/v7
Thanks. Good to see this is being addressed.7im wrote:Developer work on this was already proceding without a ticket. Harlam had communicated this directly to Joe. Now you can track the work's progress directly... Ticket # 872
- Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:33 pm
- Forum: 3rd party contributed software
- Topic: HFM.NET - Monitoring Application for Folding@Home v7
- Replies: 768
- Views: 820070
Re: HFM.NET - Monitoring Application for Folding@Home v6/v7
The bug I reported here seems to be triggered by HFM.NET too. Linux v7 clients with really long logs will segfault when HFM.NET tries to refresh the log. This happened to me when adding my two Linux SMP folders to HFM.NET -- both segfaulted. I restarted both clients, which regenerated a (much shorte...
- Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:50 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Deadlines way too short on 8001, 8004, 8011 [Not]
- Replies: 24
- Views: 6048
Re: Deadlines way too short on 8001, 8004, 8011
As others have said, there's already a published policy for points based on the newer/faster i5 CPU (rather than the P4) which gives about the same uniprocessor PPD as the older policy. I have not seen a published policy for the deadline, though apparently one is being used. Presumably the 20* fact...
- Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:44 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Deadlines way too short on 8001, 8004, 8011 [Not]
- Replies: 24
- Views: 6048
Re: Deadlines way too short on 8001, 8004, 8011
Actually, there is a strict formula. Read that page again!!! The formula is strict, of course; the additional variables cause, well, variation. PG is free to substitute different k values to balance out a change in the deadline time. The old formula had no option to include a k value to counteract ...