Search found 7 matches

by Jaqui
Sat Aug 22, 2020 10:13 pm
Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
Topic: covid moonshot bad wu setup
Replies: 52
Views: 40618

Re: covid moonshot bad wu setup

muziqaz wrote: You you might have one of these A10 7300, A10 7350B, A10 7600P, A10 8700P, A10 8700B, A10 Micro 6700T. All of them are APUs, and their GPUs are super slow
Bingo!
A10 8700P
But there is a dedicated separate GPU. The folding app does find 2 gpus.
1 r7 and 1 r6
by Jaqui
Fri Aug 21, 2020 2:28 pm
Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
Topic: covid moonshot bad wu setup
Replies: 52
Views: 40618

Re: covid moonshot bad wu setup

AMD Radeon R6 dual gpu ( 6 cores )
AMD A10 ( 4 cores )
by Jaqui
Fri Aug 21, 2020 9:49 am
Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
Topic: covid moonshot bad wu setup
Replies: 52
Views: 40618

Re: covid moonshot bad wu setup

Maybe your AMD dual GPU is too weak and should be excluded from p13422 assignment? maybe, but the 134xx wus are meant to help refine the wu design and allocation according to another thread about them. the first one I posted about has dropped the eta so it might finish in time, the second has delay...
by Jaqui
Fri Aug 21, 2020 7:21 am
Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
Topic: covid moonshot bad wu setup
Replies: 52
Views: 40618

Re: covid moonshot bad wu setup

Eep! Have you noticed other 13422 WUs that take this long to complete? Is it just a few RUNs that seem to have this problem? These WUs are designed to take ~2 hours to complete, so it's surprising they would consume 3.66 days unless there are a few problematic RUNs that snuck through. ~ John Choder...
by Jaqui
Thu Aug 20, 2020 10:55 pm
Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
Topic: covid moonshot bad wu setup
Replies: 52
Views: 40618

covid moonshot bad wu setup

13422 (2191, 3, 1) My computer has 1.85 days to complete this work unit. work unit eta: 3.66 days This wu is only at 4.57% and has been started within the last hour. This seems to be really badly arranged if it is less than 2 days to complete by design and the radeon r7 gpu will take nearly 4 days.
by Jaqui
Wed Aug 12, 2020 4:54 am
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: Project 16918 sitting at less than 10% of average performanc
Replies: 15
Views: 5051

Re: Project 16918 sitting at less than 10% of average perfor

I am guessing from what you have posted you are using web control rather than advanced control and iirc that interface only uses the Expiration Deadline so might be tight but hopefully it will get there. Yup, I'm using the web control and nope, it didn't squeeze in, 5 hours and 28 minutes late. The...
by Jaqui
Sun Aug 09, 2020 2:15 pm
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: Project 16918 sitting at less than 10% of average performanc
Replies: 15
Views: 5051

Re: Project 16918 sitting at less than 10% of average perfor

I just recently started with the newest web based client so my detailed data about the cores is less, I have unit 16918 (46, 22, 5) running on one of the gpus ( dual radeon m7 / m6 ) and noticed the is a long running unit, with a long time for it to run. Oddly, the unit processes BETTER ( faster ) i...