Folding Forum

Every project has its preferred and final deadline listed on http://fah-web.stanford.edu/psummary.html
If you use Fahmon application ( http://fahmon.net/ ) you can easy monitor progress of folding or time remaining to the finish, so you can estimate if you finish WU before preferred deadline.

2653 = 4400 PPD on a Quad @ 3.2Ghz 3065 = 3500 PPD on a Quad @ 3.2Ghz 3064 = 3000 PPD on a Quad @ 3.2Ghz 3062 = 3500 PPD on a Quad @ 3.2Ghz From my experience: Quad Q6600 @ 3.15 GHz on XP: ---------------------------------------------------- 2653 = 2880 PPD (1 SMP) 4200 PPD (2 SMP) 3065 = 3000 PPD ...

I encountred the same "1-4 long interaction" error 2 days ago: [23:55:23] 17:33:25] Project: 3062 (Run 3, Clone 77, Gen 26) [17:33:25] [17:33:25] Assembly optimizations on if available. [17:33:25] Entering M.D. [17:33:31] Rejecting checkpoint [17:33:32] ProteinWriting local files [17:33:32...

The same here: 3065 (Run 2, Clone 99, Gen 12) results sent on 2088-04-25 17:30 UTC, not yet credited. [09:54:02] - Ask before connecting: No [09:54:02] - User name: zorzyk (Team 91739) [09:54:02] [09:54:22] Project: 3065 (Run 2, Clone 99, Gen 12) [09:54:22] [09:54:23] Assembly optimizations on if av...

I'm not sure if it helps but my computer (FAH SMP 2653 stable) freezes and BSODs have taken place when I got 3060 for the first time. Up to that point I folded many 2653 and some 305x, but not 3060. I did boost northbridge voltage (MCH on my abit matherboard). From that point I fold almost exclusive...

In my opinion two times slower is not normal. MacPro 8 cores is built on double Xeon quad core 2.8MHz basis.
Two times slower means that your 3064 is utilizing 2 cores instead of four. How do you run your SMP client?

toTOW wrote:You can compare with the 2653 ... they fold at the same speed but 2605 is linux only

OK
Project 3064 gets almost exactly the same results as 2653, but 2653 folds slightly quicker (1-2 seconds quicker per frame).

Protein: p3064_lambda5_2003Extra SSE boost OK. This project comes up as worth 1753 points and yet takes twice as long to run as a project 2605 worth 1760 points. Increase is warning me that it may not complete in time as it takes 44 hours at 38pph. It will definetly not make it for the preferred ti...

chungenhung, do YOU want to tell people, what is "better" for them?
Let everyone has right to decide on their own.

"code box" works well in Opera 9.26 / XP SP2.

How can we translate power of SMP client into flops?
I'd like to know, what is the percentage of SMP clients in total number 179 TFlops of Windows OS.
Is it possible to estimate?

bollix47 wrote:If you follow the Project Summary link at the top of this forum you will see that the preferred deadline for 3064 is actually 1.36 days.(...)

In fact, the preferred deadline for 3064 is set now to 1.80 days, which equals to 43 hours. Probably this value has been increased in background

A-Ch with one SMP client on Pentium D915 (2800 MHz stock, dual core, 1 MB RAM) gives about 5% decrease of folding time, which means about 2.5 hours less needed to complete WU (p2653: was ca. 52 h, with A-Ch now 49h 15mins), and PPD raised from 815 to 855.

bruce wrote:Somebody from the Pande Group will have to sort this one out.

Would the issue mentioned here be examined by a person from Pande Group, or I have to send a PM to someone first?

We first see Project: 2453 (Run 130, Clone 35, Gen 6) when it says Working on Unit 02 [March 3 09:09:42] which means it was initially assigned some time before the oldest part of FAHlog that you posted. Does that happen to also be in FAHlog-Prev? (If not, don't worry about it.) This part comes from...