It's in there: 0x1002:0x6749:1:4:Turks [FirePro V4900 (FireGL V)]
I have yet to be able to figure out the difference between a white-listed and black listed GPU on this list though.
Search found 4 matches
- Mon Nov 11, 2013 6:46 pm
- Forum: New GPUs (whitelist)
- Topic: ATI:AMD FirePro V4900
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6190
- Mon Nov 11, 2013 5:05 pm
- Forum: New GPUs (whitelist)
- Topic: ATI:AMD FirePro V4900
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6190
Re: ATI:AMD FirePro V4900
So since the V4900 is similar to the 6670, can that be whitelisted as well? 
I think Turks-based is okay?
I think Turks-based is okay?- Fri Oct 04, 2013 1:03 pm
- Forum: New GPUs (whitelist)
- Topic: ATI:AMD FirePro V4900
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6190
Re: ATI:AMD FirePro V4900
Aha! So the whitelist is really a bit of a greylist. 
I'll stop trying to force OpenCL drivers down them then. Thank you for the help!
I'll stop trying to force OpenCL drivers down them then. Thank you for the help!- Fri Oct 04, 2013 11:36 am
- Forum: New GPUs (whitelist)
- Topic: ATI:AMD FirePro V4900
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6190
ATI:AMD FirePro V4900
I recently came across a pair of V4900s, but can't seem to get them folding. As far as I can tell they are in the whitelist, and I downloaded the most recent whitelist into my FAHClient folder. I do get an "Empty work server" message in the logs. Does this just mean that for the past coupl...