Search found 19 matches
- Thu May 12, 2011 5:28 am
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Can FAH be made GREEN?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1831
Re: Can FAH be made GREEN?
A few months ago they were the bees knees, but now the 48 core G34 rigs are doing simply insane ppd. But that is progress no?
- Thu May 12, 2011 2:56 am
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Can FAH be made GREEN?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1831
Re: Can FAH be made GREEN?
One excellent solution is to get 48 core plus G34 monsters that can crunch a bigadv overnight on off peak power and relax during the day.
My SR2s are just too damn slow to do a bigadv: 17 to 24 hrs...
My SR2s are just too damn slow to do a bigadv: 17 to 24 hrs...
- Sun Apr 24, 2011 1:49 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2685 (Run 1, Clone 10, Gen 88) - credit missing?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 610
Re: Project: 2685 (Run 1, Clone 10, Gen 88) - credit missing
Yup, that makes sense. I didn't realize the upload had not worked before changing names to Kanakis.... My fault.
Thanks for solving the mystery, I will be more careful next time...
Thanks for solving the mystery, I will be more careful next time...
- Sat Apr 23, 2011 9:19 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2685 (Run 1, Clone 10, Gen 88) - credit missing?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 610
Project: 2685 (Run 1, Clone 10, Gen 88) - credit missing?
Hi guys, Project: 2685 (Run 1, Clone 10, Gen 88) - credit missing? I think we are missing credit for a work unit that had some problems due to complications of using Langouste with -oneunit flag and changing users/passkeys... Long story short: I fold for other people, one week at a time. Using Linux...
- Wed Mar 02, 2011 2:24 am
- Forum: Scientific discussions (Non-FAH)
- Topic: Supermicro Shows Off 80-Core Xeon Server
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2667
- Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:54 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 130.237.232.237
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2934
Re: 130.237.232.237
Ok, that sounds exactly like the smoking gun - my uploads always take 18 to 25 mins, and they would time out. ADSL in Australia is not very fast at uploads. Will try and upload them again... EDIT: uploaded all three fine - getting credit of 80,000 each instead of 126,000, but better than nothing. So...
- Fri Feb 25, 2011 1:01 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 130.237.232.237
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2934
Re: 130.237.232.237
I have shut down today, but all three machines were humming along fine eating plenty of 6900s recently. Updated all three to A5 and all three grabbed 6901s and fail. All are Windows 7 64bit. Musky reports his unit did upload fine eventually, so I guess I must be special! Although punching http://130...
- Fri Feb 25, 2011 5:36 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 130.237.232.237
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2934
Re: 130.237.232.237
Sorry I didn't know which to do - I posted as a work unit problem as it seems to be having trouble with multiple servers/ports: 130.237.232.237:8080 130.237.232.237:80 130.237.165.141:8080 130.237.165.141:80 SR2#1: [20:33:14] Completed 250000 out of 250000 steps (100%) [20:33:25] DynamicWrapper: Fin...
- Fri Feb 25, 2011 2:34 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 130.237.232.237
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2934
130.237.232.237
Hi Guys, Yesterday updated client and got 3 new 6901s. All have failed to upload after finishing ~ 7 hours ago. Musky from [H] is also reporting problems. Hard to tell, lots of problems here. It is Langouste, or the work server, or a new core local bug in corrupting file data? Units finished, langou...
- Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:44 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Sequence of WU up and downloads
- Replies: 6
- Views: 948
Re: Sequence of WU up and downloads
I use it, works very well. Means my downtime of about 20 mins between units is now about 3 mins. For the original poster it would seem a must.Napoleon wrote:Yet another option is setting up a 3rd party utility called Langouste. Haven't tried it myself, though.
- Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:49 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 6900 (Run 5, Clone 19, Gen 10)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 911
Re: Project: 6900 (Run 5, Clone 19, Gen 10)
STOP this unit before it kills us all!! :eo :lol: I am the 4th person from [H] to cop this one. http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1568872 (Hangs with 0% CPU usage on first frame) http://www.pbase.com/image/131154517/original.jpg EDIT: -ok looks like I caught it after it had had a few goes at it:...
- Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:37 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 6900 (Run 30, Clone 19, Gen 2)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 998
Re: Project: 6900 (Run 30, Clone 19, Gen 2)
Ok, I had just missed it in the HFM log - it wraps around - tired eyes.
So they auto assigned me a 2686, in which time I had sorted my problem, and after that finished I got this same 6900 back but this time completed it.
So I did it 1.9 times to be thorough.
So they auto assigned me a 2686, in which time I had sorted my problem, and after that finished I got this same 6900 back but this time completed it.
So I did it 1.9 times to be thorough.
- Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:23 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 6900 (Run 30, Clone 19, Gen 2)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 998
Re: Project: 6900 (Run 30, Clone 19, Gen 2)
Oh sorry, that would make it easier - I fold under "digitalFX" for team 33, the one, the only [H].
Can't find any completed logfile - just the 2 stabs at it mentioned earlier. EDIT - nope, HFM was messing with me - found it
Can't find any completed logfile - just the 2 stabs at it mentioned earlier. EDIT - nope, HFM was messing with me - found it
- Mon Dec 06, 2010 8:41 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 6900 (Run 30, Clone 19, Gen 2)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 998
Re: Project: 6900 (Run 30, Clone 19, Gen 2)
Sounds like it was me then... I presumed as much and made adjustments for stability... thanks for following that up.
- Sat Dec 04, 2010 3:40 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 6900 (Run 30, Clone 19, Gen 2)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 998
Project: 6900 (Run 30, Clone 19, Gen 2)
Hi guys, I think this one was possibly due to me upping my memory speed a few days before, but just in case I thought I would report it... I upped baseclock rather high, keeping GHz the same, to get mem speed up, but potentially introduced instability. It passed Memtest, intelburntest, and a few hou...