Folding Forum

KWSN_PToT wrote:Now, there is an added dis-incentive: Early Return Bonus (for GPUs).

I see an incentive for people with GPUs. I do not see a penalty for people not running GPUs.

Awesome! Showed it to my gf and she was rather impressed.

Well done everyone who has contributed to this! I'm very happy to have been able to contribute!

Can someone fix the TFLOPS (per client) graph? It's including the physical numbers and I can't figure out how to change it.. Also, could the NVIDIA numbers be added?

If I may direct your attention to 7/23/12 and 7/24/12, why are there fewer total CPUs (Windows, Mac Power PC) on the 24th compared to the 23rd? Was this a clerical error by whomever entered it (possibly me)?

One particular anomaly that interests me: Between November 2010 and January 2011, the nVIDIA numbers plummeted while the ATI numbers soared. I wish we had more data within those gaps, but its quite the curiosity that nVIDIA was doing incredibly well and ATI not doing not so well, then almost all of ...

If you think about it though, the current TFLOPS levels are still within the (vague) bounds of "normal." It's still above the lowest point for 2010. I'd still call it seasonal fluctuation (it doesn't matter how high you started-- what matters is the lowest sustained level, which admittedly...

Is one really needed for Windows?

Glad you're here with us, kaleb-zero! It's unfortunate that you don't have the data anymore, but thank you for your contributions nonetheless.


Does anyone have any connection to someone at the Pande Group who would know if archives of the stats page are kept??

Does anyone know / have a way to message the guy who made this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:FAH-tflops.PNG It covers a year that's pretty sparse on our chart, but he doesn't have a Wikipedia User page so I can't leave him a message. Thoughts? Edit: I haven't touched the Per Client graph so I d...

The issue with the Active ATI GPU count for 12/12/2010 is from an accidental copy and paste of the Linux active CPUs.. Will see if I can find a corrected number.

Edit: Found and fixed it.

I was starting from the back! Not a big deal-- I'll go back to the front.

I'm doing it that way (half and half).

I actually liked it with the dots; it made it apparent which time frames had more/less data than others..

Thanks for helping!

Found a goldmine!

http://translate.google.com/translate?h ... %3Dimvnsfd


36 pages of stats from one of the most sparse regions of the graph (July 2008 through August 2009)! I'll start adding it, though it will take a while! How exciting. Help would be greatly appreciated for this.

Wonder if it has anything to do with the 600 series? Either way it's good to see an increase after a long dwindle.

I thought the Total CPUs didn't line up with those dates. I must have been looking at the wrong rows. I've added them in. Thanks Jesse.