Search found 32 matches

by the animal
Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:01 pm
Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
Topic: QOS Settings for Router to limit FAH network impact?
Replies: 6
Views: 1418

Re: QOS Settings for Router to limit FAH network impact?

Langouste allows upload capping.

viewtopic.php?f=14&t=11615
by the animal
Sun Sep 04, 2011 3:04 pm
Forum: Issues with a specific server
Topic: 130.237.232.141
Replies: 104
Views: 26516

Re: 130.237.232.141:8080 Upload Problems

I finished a 6900 about 6 hours ago, still not uploaded.
by the animal
Fri Jul 22, 2011 1:49 am
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: P6904(2, 15, 5) no points
Replies: 2
Views: 587

Re: P6904(2, 15, 5) no points

No one?
by the animal
Sun Jul 17, 2011 7:40 am
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: P6904(2, 15, 5) no points
Replies: 2
Views: 587

P6904(2, 15, 5) no points

I uploaded this around 7:20 pm Friday but have yet to see any points. Could someone check this for me?

Edit: That's EDT & my Folding name is actually theAnimal.
by the animal
Sat Jul 09, 2011 5:14 am
Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
Topic: Bigadv points change
Replies: 563
Views: 136862

Re: Bigadv points change

RoomateoYo wrote:I just noticed on the Project Summary that the bigadv base point values have gone up.
I'm not seeing any change. Link?
by the animal
Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:16 am
Forum: Issues with a specific server
Topic: What 's up with the bigadv server(s) ?
Replies: 44
Views: 10241

Re: What 's up with the bigadv server(s) ?

7im wrote:-bigadv should fall back to regular -smp automatically. No one should have to change any switches. But until that happens...
Then something must have been changed in assigning WU because I did get regular SMP occasionally even as little as 4 days ago.
by the animal
Tue May 31, 2011 4:03 pm
Forum: Issues with a specific server
Topic: Work server 130.237.232.237
Replies: 15
Views: 3691

Re: Assignment server 130.237.232.237:8080

Not working for me either, I've switched to smp for now.
by the animal
Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:13 pm
Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
Topic: Stanford having problems?
Replies: 4
Views: 1177

Re: Stanford having problems?

Server status looks fine.
by the animal
Sun Mar 20, 2011 4:40 am
Forum: Scientific discussions (Non-FAH)
Topic: Need more hardware to keep outpacing IBM
Replies: 11
Views: 4146

Re: Need more hardware to keep outpacing IBM

Adam A. Wanderer wrote:P.S. Have all of the Windows 7 users out there installed Service Pack 1 yet? The PC runs a lot smoother with this new service pack.
I had no issue installing but noticed zero difference.
by the animal
Sun Feb 13, 2011 10:52 pm
Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
Topic: at 100% get error 77
Replies: 43
Views: 6260

Re: at 100% get error 77

derrickmcc wrote:WinXP32 is limited to 3Gb memory.
No, it can see a full 4GB, and then some of that is reserved depending on hardware. Most people have about 3.25GB available.
by the animal
Fri Aug 06, 2010 4:50 am
Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
Topic: Preferred deadline on 6701?
Replies: 15
Views: 2579

Re: Preferred deadline on 6701?

According to the project summary page, both 6701 & 6702 are 4.9 days for preferred deadline. Where are you seeing the 3.2 days?
by the animal
Thu Jul 29, 2010 4:05 am
Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
Topic: Points Delay? PPD?
Replies: 19
Views: 2008

Re: Points Delay? PPD?

Are you using a passkey for your SMP2 clients? HFM assumes you are & includes bonus points.
by the animal
Sun Sep 06, 2009 6:54 pm
Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
Topic: Fah Client Recommendation
Replies: 19
Views: 3059

Re: Fah Client Recommendation

Neosymbio wrote:Well, I don't have Linux on the first
Run it in a VM.
What do you mean by CPU, the normal FAH clients? You're saying to run two instances of it?
Yes.
by the animal
Sun Sep 06, 2009 6:47 pm
Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
Topic: Fah Client Recommendation
Replies: 19
Views: 3059

Re: Fah Client Recommendation

Linux SMP (notfred) + GPU2 on the first, with GPU set to low instead of idle priority in config.
2x CPU on the second.